Answer:
a. 0.05
b. $68,750
a. $1,150,000
b. 0.1
c. $115,000
Explanation:
Depreciation expense using the double declining method = Depreciation rate x cost of the asset
Depreciation rate = 2 x (1/useful life) = 2 / 40 = 0.05
The double-declining-balance depreciation for the first year = 0.05 x $1,375,000 = $68,750
Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life
The depreciable cost = Cost of asset - Salvage value = $1,450,000 - $300,000 = $1,150,000
The straight line rate = 1 / useful life = 1 / 10 = 0.1
The annual straight-line depreciation = $1,150,000 x 0.1 = $115,000
When calculating loan payments, to show a down payment toward the purchase of an asset, you must adjust the pv argument of the financial function.
What is pv argument?
The following arguments are used with the PV function rate: The interest rate per compounding period (necessary argument). The monthly interest rate on a loan with a 12% yearly interest rate and monthly payments would be 12% divided by 12 or 1%. The rate would then be 1%.
What is financial function?
In a firm, the functions used to obtain and manage financial resources in order to make a profit are referred to as the finance function. It generates pertinent financial resources and information, enhancing the effectiveness of other corporate operations and activities such as planning and decision-making.
Learn more about financial function: brainly.com/question/13169279
#SPJ4
Answer:
e) capacity requirement planning
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the term being mentioned is called capacity requirement planning. Like mentioned, this term refers to the process that a company undergoes in order to calculate how much of something it needs to achieve a goal and whether or not it is feasible. Which can also be used regarding work schedules like in this scenario.
Judging by the sentence wording I'm guessing the missing word would be "risks"
Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
In this scenario, the second option, which would be the percentage within each transaction that's also interest instead of the full amount, would've been lower if the rate of interest were lower because interest-related transactions would have been higher at lower rates and conversely, as opposed to the main refunds.
