Which statement is correct about a vacuole?

a stone is thrown horizonttaly from a cliff of a hill with an initial velocity of 30m/s it hits the ground at a horizontal dista

ELEN [110]

Answer:

a) Time = 2.67 s

b) Height = 35.0 m

Explanation:

a) The time of flight can be found using the following equation:

$x_{f} = x_{0} + v_{0_{x}}t + \frac{1}{2}at^{2}$ (1)

Where:

$x_{f}$ : is the final position in the horizontal direction = 80 m

$x_{0}$ : is the initial position in the horizontal direction = 0

$v_{0_{x}}$ : is the initial velocity in the horizontal direction = 30 m/s

a: is the acceleration in the horizontal direction = 0 (the stone is only accelerated by gravity)

t: is the time =?

By entering the above values into equation (1) and solving for "t", we can find the time of flight of the stone:

$t = \frac{x_{f}}{v_{0}} = \frac{80 m}{30 m/s} = 2.67 s$

b) The height of the hill is given by:

$y_{f} = y_{0} + v_{0_{y}}t - \frac{1}{2}gt^{2}$

Where:

$y_{f}$ : is the final position in the vertical direction = 0

$y_{0}$ : is the initial position in the vertical direction =?

$v_{0_{y}}$ : is the initial velocity in the vertical direction =0 (the stone is thrown horizontally)

g: is the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²

Hence, the height of the hill is:

$y_{0} = \frac{1}{2}gt^{2} = \frac{1}{2}9.81 m/s^{2}*(2.67 s)^{2} = 35.0 m$

I hope it helps you!

5 0

3 years ago

Describe the results of Ernest Rutherford's gold-foil experiment and explain how his results changed ideas about the distributio

DochEvi [55]

In Rutherford's gold foil experiment, some of the positive particles would pass through the foil and some would bounce off. This led to a new theory that all of the positive subatomic particles were in the center of the atom instead of evenly spread throughout.

4 0

3 years ago

A house is wired so that one electrical source comes to a room but many outlets and lights work from that source . when one ligh

Misha Larkins [42]

The room is wired as a parallel circuit

5 0

3 years ago

Does the horizontal distance d travelled by the ball depend on the height of release? If it does depend on the height, what is t

elena-s [515]

Answer:

Explanation:

Yes , the horizontal distance travelled by the ball will depend upon the height of release .

When a ball is thrown at some angle from a height , it has two components , the vertical component and horizontal component . The ball goes in horizontal direction due to its horizontal component . Its vertical component has no role to play . But the horizontal range covered by the body thrown

depends upon the duration of time in which it remains in air . The longer it remains in air , the greater distance it can cover horizontally .

Horizontal distance covered = t x horizontal velocity

If V be the velocity of throw and Vx be its horizontal component

Horizontal distance covered = t x Vx

Now t depends upon the height . If height rises , time of fall will increase so horizontal distance covered will increase .

If h be the height from which the body is thrown , Vy be the vertical upward component of initial velocity

from the relation

s = ut + 1/2 at²

h = - Vy t + 1/2 at²

As h increases , t will increase and therefore horizontal distance covered will increase. If the ball has only horizontal velocity initially , Vy = 0

h = 1/2 gt²

$t = \sqrt{\frac{2h}{g} }$

Horizontal distance covered = t x Vx

= $\sqrt{\frac{2h}{g} } \times V_x$

From this expression also

Horizontal distance covered is proportional to $\sqrt{h}$ .

7 0

3 years ago

A can of sardines is made to move along an x axis from x = 0.47 m to x = 1.20 m by a force with a magnitude given by F = exp(–8x

sattari [20]

If the force were constant or increasing, we could guess that the speed of the sardines is increasing. Since the force is decreasing but staying in contact with the can, we know that the can is slowing down, so there must be friction involved.
Work is the integral of (force x distance) over the distance, which is just the area under the distance/force graph.
The integral of exp(-8x) dx that we need is (-1/8)exp(-8x) evaluated from 0.47 to 1.20 .

I get 0.00291 of a Joule ... seems like a very suspicious solution, but for an exponential integral at a cost of 5 measly points, what can you expect. On the other hand, it's not really too unreasonable. The force is only 0.023 Newton at the beginning, and 0.000067 newton at the end, and the distance is only about 0.7 meter, so there certainly isn't a lot of work going on. The main question we're left with after all of this is: Why sardines ? ?

6 0

3 years ago