When light passes through sequential interfaces, there may be a change of phase upon reflection at each interface.

Anna [14]

The answer is a matter of opinion, and you're going to get different answers
from different people. Here's my take on it:

The writers, producers and advertising sponsors of these shows certainly
don't think they're boring. And definitely neither do the TV networks that
decide which ones to broadcast.

I'm not trying to say "The experts don't think they're boring, so you must
be wrong". I'm trying to say that different people have different opinions
about the same shows, and in your case, you find them boring.

My conclusion is this:
I think you're finding TV shows boring nowadays because you're growing
as a person. You've grown, developed, and matured to the point where
you're above the level of audience that the shows are pitched for. That's
a very good thing !

You're sad because you used to get pleasure and entertainment from TV,
and now it doesn't give you those things. That's like losing an old friend,
that you used to have such fun playing with, but he just doesn't do it for
you any more.

Now that you've grown up, you've made new friends. With them, you do
things that you wouldn't even understand with your younger friends. And
you develop new interests, like ... I don't know ... books, movies, hobbies,
your church, your profession, learning new things, developing new skills,
exercising your brain, writing, volunteer work, ham radio, building fine
furniture, singing, learning to write music, raising tropical plants, sculpture,
politics ... whatever turns you on. Some people never grow past the stage
where staring at the tube is all they need in life, because they don't have
what it takes to be interested in anything else. Those are the people that
TV is aimed at. But you have more, and that's why TV isn't enough for you.

There are other possible reasons why TV bores you. But until I know more
about you, I think it's a very, very good sign.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which has the most momentum?

boyakko [2]

Answer:

Both objects have the same magnitude of momentum.

Explanation:

If an object of mass $m$ is moving at a velocity of $v$ , the momentum of that object would be $m\, v$ .

The $100\; {\rm g}$ ( $0.1\; {\rm kg}$ ) object is moving at a speed of $1\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ . The magnitude of the momentum of this object would be $0.1\; {\rm kg} \times 1\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} = 0.1\; {\rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}}$ .

Similarly, the momentum of the $1\; {\rm g}$ ( $10^{-3}\; {\rm kg}$ ) object moving at a speed of $100\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ would be $10^{-3}\; {\rm kg} \times 100\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} = 0.1\; {\rm kg \cdot m \cdot s^{-1}}$ .

Hence, the magnitude of momentum is the same for the two objects.

7 0

1 year ago

According to the law of multiple proportions, if 12 g of carbon combine with 16 g of oxygen to form co, the number of grams of c

Ludmilka [50]

The number of grams of carbon that combine with 16 g of oxygen in the formation of CO₂ is 6g.

When two elements combine to make more than one compound, the masses of one element combined with a fixed amount of another element are in the ratio of whole numbers, according to the law of multiple proportions.

When combined with oxygen, carbon can produce two different compounds. They are referred to as carbon dioxide (CO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO).

Carbon monoxide is formed by combining 12 g of carbon with 16 g of oxygen whereas Carbon dioxide is formed when 12 g of carbon reacts with 32 g of oxygen. The amount of carbon is fixed at 12 g in each case. The mass ratio of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide is 16: 32, or 1: 2.

But in the given case, 16g of oxygen is reacting instead of 32g. Therefore, the number of grams of carbon reacting will be:

$\frac{12}{2}=6g$