All categories

2 years ago

Question text

Engineering

1 answer:

icang [17]2 years ago

7 0

Answer: Hello, The average velocity of the ride is 0 km/h. Your Welcome! Mark me as Brainliest!

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A second inventor was driving down the highway in her Prius one day with her hand out the window. She happened to be driving thr

Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Explanation:

It wouldn't work because the wind energy she would be collecting would actually come from the car engine.

The relative wind velocity observed from a moving vehicle is the sum of the actual wind velocity and the velovity of the vehicle.

u' = u + v

While running a car will generate a rather high wind velocity, and increase the power generated by a wind turbine, the turbine would only be able to convert part of the wind energy into electricity while adding a lot of drag. In the end, it would generate less energy that what the drag casuses the car to waste to move the turbine.

Regenerative braking uses an electric generator connected to the wheel axle to recover part of the kinetic energy eliminated when one brakes the vehicle. Normal brakes dissipate this energy as heat, a regenerative brake uses it to recharge a batttery. Note that is is a fraction of the energy that is recovered, not all of it.

A "regenerative accelerator" makes no sense. Braking is taking kinetic energy out of the vehicle, while accelerating is adding kinetic energy to it. Cars accelerate using the power from their engines.

6 0

3 years ago

Four kilograms of carbon monoxide (CO) is contained in a rigid tank with a volume of 1 m3. The tank is fitted with a paddle whee

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

a) 1 m^3/Kg

b) 504 kJ

c) 514 kJ

Explanation:

Given

-The mass of C_o2 = 1 kg

-The volume of the tank V_tank = 1 m^3

-The added energy E = 14 W

-The time of adding energy t = 10 s

-The increase in specific internal energy Δu = +10 kJ/kg

-The change in kinetic energy ΔKE = 0 and The change in potential energy

ΔPE =0

Required

(a)Specific volume at the final state v_2

(b)The energy transferred by the work W in kJ.

(c)The energy transferred by the heat transfer W in kJ and the direction of

the heat transfer.

Assumption

-Quasi-equilibrium process.

Solution

(a) The volume and the mass doesn't change then, the specific volume is constant.

v= V_tank/m ---> 1/1= 1 m^3/Kg

(b) The added work is defined by.

W =E * t ---> 14 x 10 x 3600 x 10^-3 = 504 kJ

(c) From the first law of thermodynamics.

Q - W = m * Δu

Q = (m * Δu) + W--> (1 x 10) + 504 = 514 kJ

The heat have (+) sign the n it is added to the system.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following applies to a module?

Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

D all of the above

Explanation:

because I said so

3 0

2 years ago

Two different fuels are being considered for a 2.5 MW (net output) heat engine which can operate between the highest temperature

sveta [45]

Answer:

If the heat engine operates for one hour:

a) the fuel cost at Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $409.09 while fuel 2 is $421.88.

b) the fuel cost at 40% of Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $1022.73 while fuel 2 is $1054.68.

In both cases the total cost of using fuel 1 is minor, therefore it is recommended to use this fuel over fuel 2. The final observation is that fuel 1 is cheaper.

Explanation:

The Carnot efficiency is obtained as:

$\epsilon_{car}=1-\frac{T_c}{T_H}$

Where $T_c$ is the atmospheric temperature and $T_H$ is the maximum burn temperature.

For the case (B), the efficiency we will use is:

$\epsilon_{b}=0.4\epsilon_{car}$

The work done by the engine can be calculated as:

$W=\epsilon Q=\epsilon H_v\cdot m_{fuel}$ where Hv is the heat value.

If the average net power of the engine is work over time, considering a net power of 2.5MW for 1 hour (3600s), we can calculate the mass of fuel used in each case.

$m=\frac{P\cdot t}{\epsilon H_v}$