Kepler's Laws HOPE THIS HELPS
Enormous O unpredictability is in reference to the most exceedingly terrible conceivable development rate of the calculation. So O(N log N) implies that it will never keep running in some time more terrible than O(N log N). So in spite of the fact that Al's calculation scales superior to Bob's quadratic algo, it doesn't really mean it is better for ALL info sizes.
Maybe there is critical overhead in building up it, for example, making a lot of clusters or factors. Remember that even an O(N log N) calculation could have 1000 non settled circles that official at O(N) and still be viewed as O(N log N) the length of it is the most exceedingly awful part.
The grams of 22.9 % sugar solution that contain 68.5 g of sugar is 299.13 g of solution
<u><em>calculation</em></u>
22.9% means that there are 22.9 g of sugar in 100 g of solution.
what about 68.5 g of sugar
- <em>by cross multiplication</em>
=[(68.5 g sugar x 100 g solution) /22.9 g sugar] =299.13 g of solution
Nb; <em>g sugar cancel each other</em>