Answer:
She is going at 30.4 m/s at the top of the 35-meter hill.
Explanation:
We can find the velocity of the skier by energy conservation:
On the top of the hill 1 (h₁), she has only potential energy since she starts from rest. Now, on the top of the hill 2 (h₂), she has potential energy and kinetic energy.
(1)
Where:
m: is the mass of the skier
h₁: is the height 1 = 82 m
h₂: is the height 2 = 35 m
g: is the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²
v₂: is the speed of the skier at the top of h₂ =?
Now, by solving equation (1) for v₂ we have:
Therefore, she is going at 30.4 m/s at the top of the 35-meter hill.
I hope it helps you!
Answer:
d) The 2 athletes reach the same height, because the athletes run with the same speed.
Explanation:
In the whole process , kinetic energy is converted into potential energy .
1/2 m v² = mgh
v² = 2gh
h = v² / 2g
In this expression we see that height attained does not depend upon mass of the object . At the same time it also makes it clear that it depends upon velocity . As the velocity in both the cases are same , height attained by both of them will be same. Hence option d ) is correct.
I got it keep it bucks worth u this it tooooo muchhhhhhh
'Traveling around a circular track' can be a description of constant
acceleration due only to changes in direction. But if it is, then the
progress around the circular track must be at constant speed.
Answer:
Below
Explanation:
The cars upward accel adds to the gravity accel (think about how suddenly heavy you feel when the elevator starts to move upward)
F = tension = ma
= 1400 * ( .7 + 9.81) = 14714 N
