Answer:
kidney, uterus, bladder
the second one might be a cell has received instruction to close its voltage gated salt channels
Explanation:
Answer:
8 to 10 times
Explanation:
For dry road
u= 15 mph ( 1 mph = 0.44 m/s)
u= 6.7 m/s
Let take coefficient of friction( μ) of dry road is 0.7
So the de acceleration a = μ g
a= 0.7 x 10 m/s ² ( g=10 m/s ²)
a= 7 m/s ²
We know that
v= u - a t
Final speed ,v=0
0 = 6.7 - 7 x t
t= 0.95 s
For snow road
μ = 0.4
de acceleration a = μ g
a = 0.4 x 10 = 4 m/s ²
u= 30 mph= 13.41 m/s
v= u - a t
Final speed ,v=0
0 = 30 - 4 x t'
t'=7.5 s
t'=7.8 t
We can say that it will take 8 to 10 times more time as compare to dry road for stopping the vehicle.
8 to 10 times
Answer: No
Explanation:
Length= 2cm= 20mm
Now meter stick can read to nearest millimeter.
It is given that length is to be measured with a precision of 1% of 20mm= 1/100 * 20= 0.2mm
Since the least count is 1mm of meter stick and precision required is less than that. So, meter stick cannot be used for this, travelling microscope can be used for this as it can read to 0.1mm.
Answer:
y ≈ 2.5
Explanation:
Given data:
bottom width is 3 m
side slope is 1:2
discharge is 10 m^3/s
slope is 0.004
manning roughness coefficient is 0.015
manning equation is written as
where R is hydraulic radius
S = bed slope
P is perimeter 
![Q = (2+2y) y) \times 1/0.015 [\frac{(3+2y) y}{(3+2\sqrt{5} y)}]^{2/3} 0.004^{1/2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Q%20%3D%20%282%2B2y%29%20y%29%20%5Ctimes%201%2F0.015%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%283%2B2y%29%20y%7D%7B%283%2B2%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%20y%29%7D%5D%5E%7B2%2F3%7D%200.004%5E%7B1%2F2%7D)
solving for y![100 =(2+2y) y) \times (1/0.015) [\frac{(3+2y) y}{(3+2\sqrt{5} y)}]^{2/3} \times 0.004^{1/2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=100%20%3D%282%2B2y%29%20y%29%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2F0.015%29%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%283%2B2y%29%20y%7D%7B%283%2B2%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%20y%29%7D%5D%5E%7B2%2F3%7D%20%5Ctimes%200.004%5E%7B1%2F2%7D)
solving for y value by using iteration method ,we get
y ≈ 2.5
Answer:
At the point when the quantity of bit strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just part strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of part strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used all the while. Be that as it may, when a part string obstructs inside the portion (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the comparing processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, in this way expanding the use of the multiprocessor system.When the quantity of part strings is not exactly the quantity of processors, at that point a portion of the processors would stay inert since the scheduler maps just bit strings to processors and not client level strings to processors. At the point when the quantity of bit strings is actually equivalent to the quantity of processors, at that point it is conceivable that the entirety of the processors may be used at the same time. Be that as it may, when a part string hinders inside the piece (because of a page flaw or while summoning framework calls), the relating processor would stay inert. When there are more portion strings than processors, a blocked piece string could be swapped out for another bit string that is prepared to execute, along these lines expanding the usage of the multiprocessor framework.
