Answer:
go on google and type NCEER book answers
Answer:
Technician A and Technician B both are correct.
Explanation:
Technician A accurately notes that perhaps the forms of combustion process most widely used are hemispherical and cross.
Technician B also correctly notes that in several cylinder heads, cooling system and greases gaps and pathways are found.
Answer:
Three objectives of a tariff are
1) To control trade between countries
2) To protect domestic industries
3) To provide a source of income
Three characteristics of a tariff are;
1) Adequate return
2) Attractive
3) Fairness
Explanation:
A tariff is an import or export tax placed on goods traded between countries, it serves to control the foreign trade between the two countries and to protect or develop local industry
A Tariff is an important source of income to countries
Three characteristics of a tariff are;
1) Adequate return
Proper return from the consumer should be factored in a tariff to account for the alternatives or normal expense pattern
2) Attractive
The tariff should be attractive to encourage consumption of electricity or complimentary goods
3) Fairness
Based on the consumption of related resources brought about by large scale utilization, large consumer tariff should be lower than those that consume less complementary resources.
Hey,
Who plays a role in the financial activities of a company?
<em>O D. Everyone at the company, including managers and employees</em>
Answer:
a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.
b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.
Explanation:
The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.
The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.
As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.
She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.
