All categories

3 years ago

Below is a physics question

Physics

1 answer:

Allisa [31]3 years ago

8 0

Explanation:

i1=1ampere

i1+i2=I

VA−VB=i1×3Ω=i2×6

⇒1×3=i2×6

2i=21ampere

Hence I=i1+i2=1+0.5=1.5ampere

Req=2+3+63×6=2+93×6=4Ω

equivalent circuit

Refer image .2

From KVL

1req=v

v=1.5×4

You might be interested in

A model rocket blasts off and moves upward with an acceleration of 12 m/s2 until it reaches a height of 26 m. at that height, it

Diano4ka-milaya [45]

initial acceleration of rocket is given as

a = 12 m/s^2

h = 26 m

now we can use kinematics to find its speed

$v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a h$

$v_f^2 - 0 = 2 * 12*26$

$v_f = 24.98 m/s$

now after this it will be under free fall

so now again using kinematics

$v_f = 0$

at maximum height

$v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a s$

$0 - 24.98^2 = 2 * (-9.8)* h$

$h = 31.8 m$

total height from the ground = 31.8 + 26 = 57.8 m

Part b)

now after reaching highest height it will fall to ground

So in order to find the speed we can use kinematics again

$v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a d$

$v_f^2 - 0 = 2*9.8*57.8$

$v_f = 33.67 m/s$

Part c)

first rocket accelerate to reach height 26 meter and speed becomes 24.98 m/s

now we have

$v_f - v_i = a t$

$24.98 - 0 = 12*t_1$

$t_1 = 2.1 s$

after this it will reach to highest point and final speed becomes zero

$v_f - v_i = at$

$0 - 24.98 = -9.8 * t$

$t_2 = 2.55 s$

now from this it will fall back to ground and reach to final speed 33.67 m/s

now we have

$v_f - v_i = at$

$33.67 - 0 = 9.8 * t$

$t_3 = 3.44 s$

so total time is given as

<em>t = 3.44 + 2.55 + 2.1 = 8.1 s</em>

5 0

3 years ago

What is the answer? I need help.

andreev551 [17]

Answer:

moving water

Explanation:

its called hydropower its a form of renewable energy that uses moving water

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

- A cannon of 2000 kg fires a shell of 10 kg at

fgiga [73]

1) -0.5 m/s

We can solve the first part of the problem by using the law of conservation of momentum. In fact, the total momentum of the cannon - shell system must be conserved.

Before the shot, both the cannon and the shell are at rest, so the total momentum is zero:

$p=0$

After the shot, the momentum is:

$p=MV+mv$

where

M = 2000 kg is the mass of the cannon

m = 10 kg is the mass of the shell

v = 100 m/s is the velocity of the shell (we take as positive the direction of motion of the shell)

V = ? is the velocity of the cannon

Since momentum is conserved, we can write

$0=MV+mv$

And solving for V, we find the velocity of the cannon:

$V=-\frac{mv}{M}=-\frac{(10)(100)}{2000}=-0.5 m/s$

where the negative sign indicates that the cannon moves in the direction opposite to the shell.

2) 0.5 m

The motion of the cannon is a uniformly accelerated motion, so we can solve this part by using suvat equation:

$v^2-u^2=2as$

where

v is the final velocity of the cannon

u = 0.5 m/s is the initial velocity of the cannon (now we take as positive the initial direction of motion of the cannon)

$a=-0.25 m/s^2$ is the deceleration of the cannon

s is the distance travelled by the cannon

The cannon will stop when v = 0; substituting and solving the equation for s, we find the minimum safe distance required to stop the cannon:

$s=\frac{v^2-u^2}{2a}=\frac{0-0.5^2}{2(-0.25)}=0.5 m$

7 0

4 years ago

a car moving with a speed of 10 metre per second is accelerator at the rate of 2 metre per second square find its velocity after

STatiana [176]

a = ( v(2) - v(1) ) ÷ ( t(2) - t(1) )

2 = ( v(2) - 10 ) ÷ ( 6 - 0 )

2 × 6 = v(2) - 10

v(2) = 12 + 10

v(2) = 22 m/s

7 0

3 years ago

Name TWO WEAKNESSES of the model pictured below

Nikolay [14]

Answer:

Here are a few:

1) The orbital radius of these planets is ridiculously small an in no way representative of their actual radii.

2) The planets will only line up like that once every 5200 years, making this very unrepresentative of their usual relations - although this does make their order in distance from the sun.

3) The nebulae, comet, lens flare, and other junk in the background is incorrect.

4) If this is meant as a representation of the planets, then Pluto should not be there as it is now considered a planetoid.

5) The planets are incorrectly scaled both to each other and to the sun.

7 0

3 years ago