Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
Answer:
I'm sorry I just need points
Explanation:
Answer:
if the object sank then that object has a greater density then water. if the object floated then its density is lower then water.
Explanation:
lets say object 1 has a density of 24/cm3. the density is greater then water (1.0000g/cm3) so it would sink. now lets say object 2 has a density of 0.79383g/cm3 since it's less then the density of water (1.0000g/cm3) it would float.
Your answer is 1-3-2-4 , grass sand water rock
