First we need to find the acceleration of the skier on the rough patch of snow.
We are only concerned with the horizontal direction, since the skier is moving in this direction, so we can neglect forces that do not act in this direction. So we have only one horizontal force acting on the skier: the frictional force,
. For Newton's second law, the resultant of the forces acting on the skier must be equal to ma (mass per acceleration), so we can write:
Where the negative sign is due to the fact the friction is directed against the motion of the skier.
Simplifying and solving, we find the value of the acceleration:
Now we can use the following relationship to find the distance covered by the skier before stopping, S:
where
is the final speed of the skier and
is the initial speed. Substituting numbers, we find:
Answer:
a. 2v₀/a b. 2v₀/a
Explanation:
a. Since you are moving with a constant velocity v₀, the distance, s you cover in time = t max is s = v₀t.
Since the dragster starts from rest with an acceleration, a, using
s' = ut + 1/2at² where u = 0 and s' = distance moved by dragster
s' = 0t + 1/2at²
s' = 1/2at²
Since the distance moved by me and the dragster must be the same,
s = s'
v₀t. = 1/2at²
v₀t. - 1/2at² = 0
t(v₀ - 1/2at) = 0
t= 0 or v₀ - 1/2at = 0
t= 0 or v₀ = 1/2at
t= 0 or t = 2v₀/a
So the maximum time tmax = 2v₀/a
b. Since the distance covered by me to meet the dragster is s = v₀t in time, t = tmax which is also my distance from the dragster when it started. So, my distance from the dragster when it started is s = v₀(2v₀/a)
= 2v₀/a
Interference and diffraction are the phenomena that support only the wave theory of light. Options 2 and 3 are correct.
<h3 /><h3>What is the interference of waves?</h3>
The result of two or more wave trains flowing in opposite directions on a crossing or coinciding pathways. This phenomenon is known as the interference of waves.
The phenomenon of interference occurs when two wave pulses are traveling along a string toward each other.
The light wave hypothesis states that light behaves like a wave. Since light is an electromagnetic wave, it may be transmitted without a physical medium.
Light has magnetic and electric fields, much like electromagnetic waves do.
Transverse waves, such as those seen in light waves, oscillate in the same direction as the wave's path. A wave of light may experience interference as well as diffraction as a result of these properties.
All of the remaining options are the light phenomenon.
Hence, options 2 and 3 are correct.
To learn more about the interference of waves refer to the link;
brainly.com/question/16098226
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em><u>mark</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>me</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>brianliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>plz</u></em>
Explanation:
- Law of inertia, also called Newton's first law, postulate in physics that, if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force.
- Law of Inertia states that a body in a state of rest or uniform motion remains in the same state until and unless an external force acts on it.
- A body continues to be in its state of rest or in uniform motion along a straight line unless an external force is applied on it. This law is also called law of inertia.
Answer:
A) ( - 200t + 40 ) volts
B) b) anticlockwise , c) anticlockwise , d) clockwise , e) clockwise
Explanation:
Given data:
magnetic flux (Φm) = 5.0t^2 − 2.0t
number of turns = 20
<u>a) determine induced emf </u>
E = - N 
= - N ( 10t - 2 ) = - 20 ( 10t - 2 )
= - 200t + 40 volts
<u>b) Determine direction of induced current </u>
i) at t = 0
E = - 0 + 40 ( anticlockwise direction )
ii) at t = 0.10
E = -20 + 40 = 20 ( anticlockwise direction )
iii) at t = 1
E = - 200 + 40 = - 160 ( clockwise direction)
iv) at t = 2
E = -400 + 40 = - 360 ( clockwise direction )
