Answer:
has units of distance
has units of distance over time
has units of distance over 
has units of distance over 
Explanation:
Since the expression for the distance is:
then:
has units of distance
has units of distance over time
has units of distance over
has units of distance over
because we are supposed to be able to add all of the terms and get a distance. So the products on each term that contains factors of time (t) should be cancelling those time units with units in the denominator of the multiplicative constant s that accompany them.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
A theory can be changed when new evidence is found. A law doesn't change because it is universally a fact. It doesn't need new evidence to support it.
You can look at groups in the same group (the columns), since they tend to have similar properties. For example, the alkali metals in group one react aggressively with water and form white compounds.
Once again, you'd need to know that there are 60 seconds in a minute, and 60 minutes in an hour :)
I'd say converting the minimum wage into cents rather than dollars would make this problem a lot easier. $8.25 = 825 ¢.
So if this person is earning 825 ¢ in an hour, we should divide 825 by 60 to find out how much they're making in a minute:
825 ÷ 60 = 13.75 ¢
Now, we just need to divide by 60 again to work out how much that is in seconds:
13.75 ÷ 60 = 0.229 ¢
So to answer your question, this person would make 0.229 ¢ a second (¢/s) on the job with minimum wage. Converting this value to dollars wouldn't be viable (as it'd just be $0.00, so it's best to leave the answer in cents!)
