Answer:
Hey, how you doing.
I think (warning I said think not to know!) that it is A because of the following:
Eruptions can be predicted if you have a good history of their activity. you also need to have lots of equipment constantly monitoring. Tsunamis can't really be predicted because earthquakes can't (that's why B is wrong). But however, if there is a giant asteroid impact you can predict that it will cuase i giant tsunamis.
A is the only one with 1 correct answer so I would go with it.
Answer:
We could get the time taken by the ball to return back to earth, using the formula:
s = u t + ½ a t², where
s = displacement of the body moving with initial velocity u, acceleration 'a' in time t.
In the present case s=0 (as the ball returns back to starting time)
u= 30 m/s; a = -10 m/s² ( negative sign as a is in opposite direction to u); t=?
0 = 30 t - ½ ×10 ×t²; ==> 5 t = 30, t= 6 second.
So ball will return back after 6 second after being thrown up.
Explanation:
I looked it up
Hope this helps
Answer: B. Galaxy (happy to help)
Explanation:
The have the same number of electron shells
Answer:
Phase Difference
Explanation:
When the sound waves have same wavelength, frequency and amplitude we just need the phase difference between them at a particular location to determine whether the waves are in constructive interference or destructive interference.
Interference is a phenomenon in which there is superposition of two coherent waves at a particular location in the medium of propagation.
When the waves are in constructive interference then we get a resultant wave of maximum amplitude and vice-versa in case of destructive interference.
- For constructive interference the waves must have either no phase difference or a phase difference of nλ, where n is any natural number.
- For destructive interference the waves must have a phase difference of n×0.5λ, where n is any odd number.