1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kipiarov [429]
3 years ago
9

Are all mutation effects the same? Provide examples.

Chemistry
2 answers:
Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

No; only a small percentage of variants cause genetic disorders—most have no impact on health or development. For example, some variants alter a gene's DNA sequence but do not change the function of the protein made from the gene.

Often, gene variants that could cause a genetic disorder are repaired by certain enzymes before the gene is expressed and an altered protein is produced. Each cell has a number of pathways through which enzymes recognize and repair errors in DNA. Because DNA can be changed or damaged in many ways, DNA repair is an important process by which the body protects itself from disease.

A very small percentage of all variants actually have a positive effect. These variants lead to new versions of proteins that help an individual better adapt to changes in his or her environment. For example, a beneficial variant could result in a protein that protects an individual and future generations from a new strain of bacteria.

Because a person's genetic code can have many variants with no effect on health, diagnosing genetic disorders can be difficult.

When determining if a gene variant is associated with a genetic disorder, the variant is evaluated using scientific research to date, such as information on how the variant affects the function or production of the protein that is made from the gene and previous variant classification data. The variant is then classified on a spectrum based on how likely the variant is to lead to the disorder.

Gene variants, as they relate to genetic disorders, are classified into one of five groups:

Pathogenic: The variant is responsible for causing disease. There is ample scientific research to support an association between the disease and the gene variant. These variants are often referred to as mutations.

Likely pathogenic: The variant is probably responsible for causing disease, but there is not enough scientific research to be certain.

Variant of uncertain significance (VUS or VOUS): The variant cannot be confirmed to play a role in the development of disease. There may not be enough scientific research to confirm or refute a disease association or the research may be conflicting.

Likely benign: The variant is probably not responsible for causing disease, but there is not enough scientific research to be certain.

Benign: The variant is not responsible for causing disease. There is ample scientific research to disprove an association between the disease and the gene variant.

Evaluation needs to be done for each variant. Just because a gene is associated with a disease, does not mean that all variants in that gene are pathogenic. Additionally, evaluation of a variant needs to be done for all diseases with which it is thought to be associated. A variant that is pathogenic for one disease, is not necessarily pathogenic for a different disease. It is important to re-evaluate variants periodically; the classification of a variant can change over time as more information about the effects of variants becomes known through additional scientific research.

otez555 [7]3 years ago
3 0
No. insertions add a nucleotide, deletions delete a nucleotide sequence.
You might be interested in
A solution is made by dissolving 4.87 g of potassium nitrate in water to a final volume of 86.4 mL solution. What is the weight/
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

A solution is made by dissolving 4.87 g of potassium nitrate in water to a final volume of 86.4 mL solution. The weight/weight % or percent by mass of the solute is :

<u>2.67%</u>

Explanation:

Note : Look at the density of potassium nitrate in water if given in the question.

<u><em>You are calculating </em></u><u><em>weight /Volume</em></u><u><em> not weight/weight % or percent by mass of the solute</em></u>

Here the <u>weight/weight % or percent by mass</u> of the solute is asked : So first convert the<u> VOLUME OF SOLUTION into MASS</u>

Density of potassium nitrate in water KNO3 = 2.11 g/mL

density=\frac{mass}{volume}

Density = 2.11 g/mL

Volume of solution = 86.4 mL

2.11=\frac{mass}{86.4}

mass = 2.11\times 86.4

mass=182.3grams

Mass of Solute = 4.87 g

Mass of Solution = 183.2 g

w/w% of the solute =

= \frac{mass\ of\ solute}{mass\ of\ solution}\times 100

=\frac{4.87}{183.2}\times 100

w/w%=2.67%

8 0
3 years ago
put the contributions to the understanding of the atomic structure in order from most recent at the top to the earliest at the b
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

From Top to Bottom:

- Democritus coming up with the concept of an atom

- Dalton discovering that atoms are the smallest part of an element

- Rutherford discovering the nucleus of an atom

- Thomson discovering electrons

- Bohr modeling electrons orbiting the nucleus

- Schrodinger modeling electrons in the electron cloud

Explanation:

The best way to think about this is from the inside out. Democrats (who lived long before any of the other scientists mentioned) was the one who thought of the idea of the atom. - Therefore, this must be first because all other choices are elaborations on the idea that atoms exist. Next must be Dalton. Dalton saw atoms as "cannonballs" if you will; a solid mass. So then after that, Rutherford and his gold foil experiment (he discovered that some rays he shot through gold foil were deflected back; ie the existence of concentrated areas in an atom, ie the nucleus). Then we get into the information on electrons. We must start with discovery (Thomson). Heres where it gets complicated. Electrons don't <em>actually </em>orbit the nucleus, they exist in electron clouds. So it would be Bohr, who came up with the idea that electron exist outside the nucleus, then Schrodinger, who elaborated on Bohr's theory. Hope this helps!

Nat, Junior

Accel + AP Chem student

5 0
1 year ago
Cars run on gasoline, where octane (C8H18) is the principle component. This combustion reaction is responsible for generating en
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

  • 10.19 g CO₂
  • 4.69 g H₂O

Explanation:

The combustion reaction of Octane is:

  • C₈H₁₈ → 8CO₂ + 9H₂O

To calculate the mass of CO₂ and H₂O produced, we need to know the mass of octane combusted.

We calculate the mass of Octane from the given volume and density, using the following <em>conversion factors</em>:

  • 1 gallon = 3.785 L
  • 1 L = 1000 mL

Now we<u> convert 1.24 gallons to mL</u>:

  • 1.24 gallon * \frac{3.785L}{1gallon} *\frac{1000mL}{1L} = 4693.4 mL

We <u>calculate the mass of Octane</u>:

  • 4693.4 mL * 0.703 g/mL = 3.30 g Octane

Now we use the <em>stoichiometric ratios</em> and <em>molecular weights</em> to <u>calculate the mass of CO₂ and H₂O</u>:

  • CO₂ ⇒ 3.30 g Octane ÷ 114g/mol * \frac{8molCO_{2}}{1molOctane} * 44 g/mol =  10.19 g CO₂
  • H₂O ⇒ 3.30 g Octane ÷ 114g/mol * \frac{9molH_{2}O}{1molOctane} * 18 g/mol = 4.69 g H₂O

7 0
4 years ago
In NMR if a chemical shift(δ) is 211.5 ppm from the tetramethylsilane (TMS) standard and the spectrometer frequency is 556 MHz,
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

The answer is: 11759 Hz

Explanation:

Given: Chemical shift: δ = 211.5 ppm, Spectrometer frequency = 556 MHz = 556 × 10⁶ Hz

In NMR spectroscopy, the chemical shift (δ), expressed in ppm, of a given nucleus is given by the equation:

\delta (ppm) = \frac{Observed\,frequency (Hz)}{Frequency\,\, of\,\,the\,Spectrometer (MHz)} \times 10^{6}

\therefore Observed\,frequency (Hz)= \frac{\delta (ppm)\times Frequency\,\, of\,\,the\,Spectrometer (MHz)}{10^{6}}

Observed\,frequency= \frac{211.5 ppm \times 556 \times 10^{6} Hz}{10^{6}} = 11759 Hz

<u>Therefore, the signal is at 11759 Hz from the TMS.</u>

6 0
4 years ago
Need help asap with this chemistry if someone could help me
Burka [1]

Answer:

<h3>1)</h3>

Structure One:

  • N: -2
  • C: 0
  • O: +1

Structure Two:

  • N: 0
  • C: 0
  • O: -1

Structure Three:

  • N: -1
  • C: 0
  • O: 0.

Structure Number Two would likely be the most stable structure.

<h3>2)</h3>
  • All five C atoms: 0
  • All six H atoms to C: 0
  • N atom: +1.

The N atom is the one that is "likely" to be attracted to an anion. See explanation.

Explanation:

When calculating the formal charge for an atom, the assumption is that electrons in a chemical bond are shared equally between the two bonding atoms. The formula for the formal charge of an atom can be written as:

\text{Formal Charge} \\ = \text{Number of Valence Electrons in Element} \\ \phantom{=}-\text{Number of Chemical Bonds} \\\phantom{=} - \text{Number of nonbonding Lone Pair Electrons}.

For example, for the N atom in structure one of the first question,

  • N is in IUPAC group 15. There are 15 - 10 = 5 valence electrons on N.
  • This N atom is connected to only 1 chemical bond.
  • There are three pairs, or 6 electrons that aren't in a chemical bond.

The formal charge of this N atom will be 5 - 1 - 6 = -2.

Apply this rule to the other atoms. Note that a double bond counts as two bonds while a triple bond counts as three.

<h3>1)</h3>

Structure One:

  • N: -2
  • C: 0
  • O: +1

Structure Two:

  • N: 0
  • C: 0
  • O: -1

Structure Three:

  • N: -1
  • C: 0
  • O: 0.

In general, the formal charge on all atoms in a molecule or an ion shall be as close to zero as possible. That rules out Structure number one.

Additionally, if there is a negative charge on one of the atoms, that atom shall preferably be the most electronegative one in the entire molecule. O is more electronegative than N. Structure two will likely be favored over structure three.

<h3>2)</h3>

Similarly,

  • All five C atoms: 0
  • All six H atoms to C: 0
  • N atom: +1.

Assuming that electrons in a chemical bond are shared equally (which is likely not the case,) the nitrogen atom in this molecule will carry a positive charge. By that assumption, it would attract an anion.

Note that in reality this assumption seldom holds. In this ion, the N-H bond is highly polarized such that the partial positive charge is mostly located on the H atom bonded to the N atom. This example shows how the formal charge assumption might give misleading information. However, for the sake of this particular problem, the N atom is the one that is "likely" to be attracted to an anion.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • in dimesional analysis, if an electric vehicle gets 4 miles/ kWh and the utility company charges 12 cents per kWh for charging i
    7·1 answer
  • The increase in the population of people living in urban areas will cause a decrease in urban sprawl.
    15·2 answers
  • What are the elements of PCl5 and the name
    6·1 answer
  • 45.8 g of NaCl is dissolved in 500. mL of a water (d = 1.00 g/mL) and is placed in the freezer at -1 °C overnight. Which stateme
    14·1 answer
  • A ____________ is a physical combination of things that can be separated. mixture compound
    8·1 answer
  • Balance the following chemical equation I would give anyone the brainiest for answering.
    11·1 answer
  • If a gas in a closed container is pressurized from 14.9 atm to 16.5 atm and its original temperature was 33.1 °C, what would the
    7·1 answer
  • Testbank, Question 143 A compound with molecular formula C8H14O4 exhibits a triplet at δ 1.3 (6H), a singlet at δ 2.6 (4H) and a
    10·1 answer
  • Hi hello I need help ASAP <br>Determine the slope of this line <br>a.2.5<br>b.0.75<br>c.1<br>d.0.4​
    8·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!