Answer:
the enantiomeric excess of the mixture is 40%
Explanation:
The computation of the enantiomeric excess of the mixture is shown below:
As we know that

Hence, the enantiomeric excess of the mixture is 40%
number one: when substances like rock and minerals are being physically broken down, its called weathering.
Number two: when particles are carried away to another location exp " a river carrying rocks to an ocean" that's called deposition
Number three: this would also be weathering because it is physically being worn down
Number four: would be a topographic map, because theses maps use lines to study elevation instead of color
Answer:
Concentrated sulfuric acid can perform a dehydration reaction with table sugar. After mixing, the color changes from white to brownish and eventually to black. The expansion of the mixture is the result of vaporization of water and CO2 inside the container.
Instability
Explanation:
Isotopes decays because they are unstable. Stable isotopes do not decay.
- For every atomic nucleus, there is a specific neutron/proton ratio.
- This ratio ensure that a nuclide is stable.
- For example, fluorine F, is 10/9 stable.
- Any nucleus with a neutron/proton combination different from its stability ratio either too many neutrons or too many protons will become unstable.
- Such nuclide will split into one or more other nuclei with the emission of small particles of matter and considerable amount of energy.
Learn more:
Radioactive brainly.com/question/10125168
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Avogadro’s Number
Avogadro’s NumberIt certainly is easy to count bananas or to count elephants (as long as you stay out of their way). However, you would be counting grains of sugar from your sugar canister for a long, long time. Atoms and molecules are extremely small – far, far smaller than grains of sugar. Counting atoms or molecules is not only unwise, it is absolutely impossible. One drop of water contains about 10 22 molecules of water. If you counted 10 molecules every second for 50 years without stopping you would have counted only 1.6 × 10 10 molecules. Put another way, at that counting rate, it would take you over 30 trillion years to count the water molecules in one tiny drop.
Avogadro’s NumberIt certainly is easy to count bananas or to count elephants (as long as you stay out of their way). However, you would be counting grains of sugar from your sugar canister for a long, long time. Atoms and molecules are extremely small – far, far smaller than grains of sugar. Counting atoms or molecules is not only unwise, it is absolutely impossible. One drop of water contains about 10 22 molecules of water. If you counted 10 molecules every second for 50 years without stopping you would have counted only 1.6 × 10 10 molecules. Put another way, at that counting rate, it would take you over 30 trillion years to count the water molecules in one tiny drop.Chemists needed a name that can stand for a very large number of items. Amedeo Avogadro (1776 – 1856), an Italian scientist, provided just such a number. He is responsible for the counting unit of measure called the mole. A mole (mol) is the amount of a substance that contains 6.02 × 10 23 representative particles of that substance. The mole is the SI unit for amount of a substance. Just like the dozen and the gross, it is a name that stands for a number. There are therefore 6.02 × 10 23 water molecules in a mole of water molecules. There also would be 6.02 × 10 23 bananas in a mole of bananas, if such a huge number of bananas ever existed