Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

5

hey will you be a friend to my best her name is alexzicancelperez she has only one friend and that me can please be her friend a

nyone

2 answers:

natita [175]2 years ago

8 0

Please mark it as brainlest answer:).

Galina-37 [17]2 years ago

4 0

Maybe but maybe not, today is not the answer but tomorrow may come but not as yet is perceived.

You might be interested in

Two technicians are discussing a vehicle that will not start. Tech A states that a problem with the immobilizer system may be th

Anestetic [448]

Technician B.

Explanation:

The starter motor is what turns the engine, until enough electricity is generated with momentum to keep the engine running and cycling. If there is a problem with the immobilizer, the engine may shake or come off the mount at higher RPMs, however, will not have any problems initially starting the engine. The starter is most important for starting the engine, therefore, Technician B is correct In this case.

3 0

3 years ago

What browser should you use with Canvas?

SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

chrome

Explanation:

i just got it right on the test.

5 0

3 years ago

What is the the force available at the roadway surface to perform work?

scoray [572]

Answer:

Tractive force or traction

Explanation:

The main purpose of the tractive forces is to improve the ability to <u>transform the engine's energy into the vehicle's movement.</u> There are several systems that have different qualities and uses. Here we explain how they work and what they are for.

In a traction vehicle with one of its axles, its ability to transmit engine power to the ground is limited for two reasons:

- At least one of the wheels must have adhesion, and this as long as it has a self-locking differential. Otherwise, simply with one lacking grip, we can no longer move forward.

- If there are two wheels that must distribute the power, it will always be easier to saturate the traction capacity of the tire than if we divide the force by four. The example is very simple: if we try to drag an object on the ground by pulling a rubber, it will stretch more than if we pull 4 identical tires, although the force we make is the same.

Contrary to what one might think, all-wheel drive vehicles are nothing recent. What happens is that it did take time to reduce the weight and size, as well as to increase the resistance of the homokinetic joints (they are articulations on the axles to allow the wheel to go up and down with the suspension or turn with the steering) to to adapt these systems to cars.

7 0

3 years ago

A 1.7 cm thick bar of soap is floating in water, with 1.1 cm of the bar underwater. Bath oil with a density of 890.0 kg/m{eq}^3

PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

The height of the oil on the side of the bar when the soap is floating in only the oil is 1.236 cm

Explanation:

The water level on the bar soap = 1.1 m mark

Therefore, the proportion of the bar soap that is under the water is given by the relation;

Volume of bar soap = LW1.7

Volume under water = LW1.1

Volume floating = LW0.6

The relative density of the bar soap = Density of bar soap/(Density of water)

= m/LW1.7/(m/LW1.1) = 1.1/1.7

Given that the oil density = 890 kg/m³

Relative density of the oil to water = Density of the oil/(Density of water)

Relative density of the oil to water = 890/1000 = 0.89

Therefore, relative density of the bar soap to the relative density of the oil = (1.1/1.7)/0.89

Relative density of the bar soap to the oil = (1.1/0.89/1.7) = 1.236/1.7

Given that the relative density of the bar soap to the oil = Density of bar soap/(Density of oil) = m/LW1.7/(m/LWX) = X/1.7 = 1.236/1.7

Where:

X = The height of the oil on the side of the bar when the soap is floating in only the oil

Therefore;

X = 1.236 cm.

3 0

4 years ago

Pam Jones worked for 41 years at the same company and had positive performance ratings and personnel records. She needed a calcu

UNO [17]

Answer:

a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.

b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.

Explanation:

The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.

The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.

As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.

She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.

5 0

3 years ago