If you walk at an average speed of 5 km/h for 30 minutes, how

If the distance d (in meters) traveled by an object in time t (in seconds) is given by the formula d=a+bt2, the si units of a an

ss7ja [257]

Distance , d = a+b $t^2$

The unit of d is in meter and t is in seconds.

So the unit of a a must be meter.

Now we have unit of b $t^2$ is meter.

So unit of b* $second^2$ = meter

Unit of b = meter/ $second^2$

So unit of a = m and unit of b = m/ $s^2$ .

8 0

2 years ago

A neutron has

zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

a neutron does not have a positive nor negative charge it remains neutral

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A uniform disk with mass 35.2 kg and radius 0.200 m is pivoted at its center about a horizontal, frictionless axle that is stati

Sergio [31]

Answer:

a) v = 1.01 m/s

b) a = 5.6 m/s²

Explanation:

a)

If the disk is initially at rest, and it is applied a constant force tangential to the rim, we can apply the following expression (that resembles Newton's 2nd law, applying to rigid bodies instead of point masses) as follows:

$\tau = I * \alpha (1)$

Where τ is the external torque applied to the body, I is the rotational inertia of the body regarding the axis of rotation, and α is the angular acceleration as a consequence of the torque.
Since the force is applied tangentially to the rim of the disk, it's perpendicular to the radius, so the torque can be calculated simply as follows:
τ = F*r (2)
For a solid uniform disk, the rotational inertia regarding an axle passing through its center is just I = m*r²/2 (3).
Replacing (2) and (3) in (1), we can solve for α, as follows:

$\alpha = \frac{2*F}{m*r} = \frac{2*34.5N}{35.2kg*0.2m} = 9.8 rad/s2 (4)$

Since the angular acceleration is constant, we can use the following kinematic equation:

$\omega_{f}^{2} - \omega_{o}^{2} = 2*\Delta \theta * \alpha (5)$

Prior to solve it, we need to convert the angle rotated from revs to radians, as follows:

$0.2 rev*\frac{2*\pi rad}{1 rev} = 1.3 rad (6)$

Replacing (6) in (5), taking into account that ω₀ = 0 (due to the disk starts from rest), we can solve for ωf, as follows:

$\omega_{f} = \sqrt{2*\alpha *\Delta\theta} = \sqrt{2*1.3rad*9.8rad/s2} = 5.1 rad/sec (7)$

Now, we know that there exists a fixed relationship the tangential speed and the angular speed, as follows:

$v = \omega * r (8)$

where r is the radius of the circular movement. If we want to know the tangential speed of a point located on the rim of the disk, r becomes the radius of the disk, 0.200 m.
Replacing this value and (7) in (8), we get:

$v= 5.1 rad/sec* 0.2 m = 1.01 m/s (9)$

b)

There exists a fixed relationship between the tangential and the angular acceleration in a circular movement, as follows:

$a_{t} = \alpha * r (9)$

where r is the radius of the circular movement. In this case the point is located on the rim of the disk, so r becomes the radius of the disk.
Replacing this value and (4), in (9), we get:

$a_{t} = 9.8 rad/s2 * 0.200 m = 1.96 m/s2 (10)$

Now, the resultant acceleration of a point of the rim, in magnitude, is the vector sum of the tangential acceleration and the radial acceleration.
The radial acceleration is just the centripetal acceleration, that can be expressed as follows:

$a_{c} = \omega^{2} * r (11)$

Since we are asked to get the acceleration after the disk has rotated 0.2 rev, and we have just got the value of the angular speed after rotating this same angle, we can replace (7) in (11).
Since the point is located on the rim of the disk, r becomes simply the radius of the disk,, 0.200 m.
Replacing this value and (7) in (11) we get:

$a_{c} = \omega^{2} * r = (5.1 rad/sec)^{2} * 0.200 m = 5.2 m/s2 (12)$

The magnitude of the resultant acceleration will be simply the vector sum of the tangential and the radial acceleration.
Since both are perpendicular each other, we can find the resultant acceleration applying the Pythagorean Theorem to both perpendicular components, as follows:

$a = \sqrt{a_{t} ^{2} + a_{c} ^{2} } = \sqrt{(1.96m/s2)^{2} +(5.2m/s2)^{2} } = 5.6 m/s2 (13)$

6 0

2 years ago

Is there a "real" simple machine that has an efficiency of 100%?

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

No, a machine cannot be 100% efficient. This is due to the movement of the moving parts siding against each other and causing friction. This friction is the one that creates heat and causes wear and tear between moving ports f the machine hence making the machine to decrease in efficiency with time

8 0

2 years ago

The opening to a cave is a tall, 30.0-cm-wide crack. A bat is preparing to leave the cave emits a 30.0 kHz ultrasonic chirp. How

Vlada [557]

Answer:

The value is $w = 7.54 \ m$