1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
2 years ago
13

Two positive charges of 1 mC and 10 mC are separated by a distance of 10 m. Find the

Physics
1 answer:
horrorfan [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

900N, charges repel

Explanation:

F = KQq/d²

K = 9 × 10^9Nm²/C²

Q= 10mC = 10 × 10^-3C

q = 1mc = 1 × 10^-3C

d = 10m

F = ?

Force = (9 × 10^9 × 10 × 10^-3 × 1 × 10^-3)/10²

= 9 × 10²

= 900N

It will be an electrostatic force of repulsion since like charges(two positive charges) repel

You might be interested in
Force Problem: Four concurrent forces are applied to a 5 Kg mass: 50 N North, 25 N East, 35 N South, and 35 N West.
Kaylis [27]

A) Net horizontal force:
Fx= -35 + 25 + -10N

Net vertical force
Fy= 50 - 35 = 15N

Net force
F^2 = fX^2 +Fy^2
F= 18N

B.) Acceleration of system
a=18/5=3.6m/s^2

C). Equilibriant force must be equal to the net force above
F1= 18N

D.) Acceleration becomes half
a1= a/2 =1.8m/s^2

E.) Equilibrant force also doubles
F" = 2F' = 36N

To learn more about Force, click on the link
brainly.com/question/12785175

#SPJ13

6 0
1 year ago
Two thousand two hundred frequent business travelers are asked which midwestern city they prefer: Indianapolis, Saint Louis, Chi
drek231 [11]
Frequency Table
City                       Frequency
Indianapolis              124
Saint Louis                416
Chicago                  1,225
Milwaukee                 435

Relative Frequency Table
City                            Relative Frequency
Indianapolis              124/2200 = 31/550
Saint Louis                416/2200 = 52/275
Chicago                  1,225/2200 = 49/88
Milwaukee                 435/2200 = 87/440
5 0
3 years ago
Approximately, What is the value of the Hubble Constant, as measured by scientists? Hypothetically, if the value of the Hubble C
Serhud [2]

Answer:

The current value of the Hubble's constant = 73 km/sec/Mpc.

t = 71.9 trillion years will be the new age of universe if the Hubble constant = 700 km/s/Mpc

Explanation:

The current value of the Hubble's constant = 73 km/sec/Mpc. However, recent discoveries in the cosmology contradicts the idea of Hubble constant as being fixed. Some scientists are not agreeing on this value and the debate is going on.

Hubble law states that how fast universe is expanding or in other words, galaxies are expanding separating with a speed directly proportional to the distance of galaxies to the earth.

Hence,

v is directly proportional to d

where, v = apparent velocity

d = distance

if we equate velocity and distance then there comes Hubble constant.

v = H_{0} x d

 H_{0} = 73 km/sec/Mpc

where, Mpc = Mega Parsec = 1 Mpc = 3.086 x 10^{19} km      

We can use Hubble constant to tell the age of universe.

t = d/v

t = d/( H_{0} xd)

t = 1/H_{0}

Scientist calculated the age of universe by using Hubble constant, which is 13.4 billion years.

Now, if we hypothetically change the value of Hubble constant,

from H_{0} = 73 km/sec/Mpc to H_{0} = 700 km/sec/Mpc

then the age of universe will be:

t = 1/H_{0}

first convert the units of new H_{0} into 1/s

H_{0} = (700) x (/3.08 x 10^{19} )

H_{0} = 227.27 x10^{-19}  = 2.27 x 10^{-21} 1/s

So,

Age of universe will be:

t = 1/H_{0} = 1/2.27x10^{-21} 1/s

t = 2.27 x 10^{21} s

t = 71.9 trillion years

t = 71.9 trillion years will be the new age of universe if the Hubble constant = 700 km/s/Mpc

       

6 0
3 years ago
A car has a velocity of 2 m/s and after driving for 10 seconds, the velocity
arsen [322]

Answer:

11

Explanation:

10 divided by 2 is 5

22 divided by 2 is 11

8 0
3 years ago
Comparing X-ray to radio wave, which has a shorter wavelength?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

x-ray

Explanation:

X-rays can penetrate through matter because of their high frequencies while radio waves are not able to do so as much. If you think about it, taking an x-ray requires a lot more energy than for radio waves to allow you to listen to songs on the radio. Hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lincoln weighs 400 newtons. What’s his mass rounded to the nearest kilogram? Assume that acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 N/kg
    5·2 answers
  • Describe the steps used by conventional sewage treatment plants to break down our sewage into a relatively safe effluent that ge
    12·1 answer
  • Calculate the peak voltage of a generator that rotates its 200-turn, 0.100 m diameter coil at 3600 rpm in a 0.800 T field.
    12·1 answer
  • If a body with a mass of 4 kg is moved by a force of 20 N, what is the rate of its acceleration?​
    9·1 answer
  • You are traveling through the forest and encounter an ancient well. You want to know how deep the well is. If you drop a coin an
    13·2 answers
  • Which color of aurora gives off higher energy light, green or red?
    9·1 answer
  • Weight is measured in units called
    11·1 answer
  • Magnetic induction cannot be done in a wood why​
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these measures a wavelength.
    6·1 answer
  • John is hiking and notices a small stream of water flowing down the side of the mountain. What part of the water cycle is John o
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!