1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tanzania [10]
2 years ago
8

Which of the following is not a function of the cooling system

Engineering
1 answer:
Pie2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

hola soy dora

Explanation:

You might be interested in
). A 50 mm diameter cylinder is subjected to an axial compressive load of 80 kN. The cylinder is partially
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

\frac{e'_z}{e_z} = 0.87142

Explanation:

Given:-

- The diameter of the cylinder, d = 50 mm.

- The compressive load, F = 80 KN.

Solution:-

- We will form a 3-dimensional coordinate system. The z-direction is along the axial load, and x-y plane is categorized by lateral direction.

- Next we will write down principal strains ( εx, εy, εz ) in all three directions in terms of corresponding stresses ( σx, σy, σz ). The stress-strain relationships will be used for anisotropic material with poisson ratio ( ν ).

                          εx = - [ σx - ν( σy + σz ) ] / E

                          εy = - [ σy - ν( σx + σz ) ] / E

                          εz = - [ σz - ν( σy + σx ) ] / E

- First we will investigate the "no-restraint" case. That is cylinder to expand in lateral direction as usual and contract in compressive load direction. The stresses in the x-y plane are zero because there is " no-restraint" and the lateral expansion occurs only due to compressive load in axial direction. So σy= σx = 0, the 3-D stress - strain relationships can be simplified to:

                          εx =  [ ν*σz ] / E

                          εy = [ ν*σz ] / E

                          εz = - [ σz ] / E   .... Eq 1

- The "restraint" case is a bit tricky in the sense, that first: There is a restriction in the lateral expansion. Second: The restriction is partial in nature, such, that lateral expansion is not completely restrained but reduced to half.

- We will use the strains ( simplified expressions ) evaluated in " no-restraint case " and half them. So the new lateral strains ( εx', εy' ) would be:

                         εx' = - [ σx' - ν( σy' + σz ) ] / E = 0.5*εx

                         εx' = - [ σx' - ν( σy' + σz ) ] / E =  [ ν*σz ] / 2E

                         εy' = - [ σy' - ν( σx' + σz ) ] / E = 0.5*εy

                         εx' = - [ σy' - ν( σx' + σz ) ] / E =  [ ν*σz ] / 2E

- Now, we need to visualize the "enclosure". We see that the entire x-y plane and family of planes parallel to ( z = 0 - plane ) are enclosed by the well-fitted casing. However, the axial direction is free! So, in other words the reduction in lateral expansion has to be compensated by the axial direction. And that compensatory effect is governed by induced compressive stresses ( σx', σy' ) by the fitting on the cylinderical surface.

- We will use the relationhsips developed above and determine the induced compressive stresses ( σx', σy' ).

Note:  σx' = σy', The cylinder is radially enclosed around the entire surface.

Therefore,

                        - [ σx' - ν( σx'+ σz ) ] =  [ ν*σz ] / 2

                          σx' ( 1 - v ) = [ ν*σz ] / 2

                          σx' = σy' = [ ν*σz ] / [ 2*( 1 - v ) ]

- Now use the induced stresses in ( x-y ) plane and determine the new axial strain ( εz' ):

                           εz' = - [ σz - ν( σy' + σx' ) ] / E

                           εz' = - { σz - [ ν^2*σz ] / [ 1 - v ] } / E

                          εz' = - σz*{ 1 - [ ν^2 ] / [ 1 - v ] } / E  ... Eq2

- Now take the ratio of the axial strains determined in the second case ( Eq2 ) to the first case ( Eq1 ) as follows:

                            \frac{e'_z}{e_z} = \frac{- \frac{s_z}{E} * [ 1 - \frac{v^2}{1 - v} ]  }{-\frac{s_z}{E}}  \\\\\frac{e'_z}{e_z} = [ 1 - \frac{v^2}{1 - v} ] = [ 1 - \frac{0.3^2}{1 - 0.3} ] \\\\\frac{e'_z}{e_z} = 0.87142... Answer

5 0
3 years ago
Please answer fast. With full step by step solution.​
lina2011 [118]

Let <em>f(z)</em> = (4<em>z </em>² + 2<em>z</em>) / (2<em>z </em>² - 3<em>z</em> + 1).

First, carry out the division:

<em>f(z)</em> = 2 + (8<em>z</em> - 2) / (2<em>z </em>² - 3<em>z</em> + 1)

Observe that

2<em>z </em>² - 3<em>z</em> + 1 = (2<em>z</em> - 1) (<em>z</em> - 1)

so you can separate the rational part of <em>f(z)</em> into partial fractions. We have

(8<em>z</em> - 2) / (2<em>z </em>² - 3<em>z</em> + 1) = <em>a</em> / (2<em>z</em> - 1) + <em>b</em> / (<em>z</em> - 1)

8<em>z</em> - 2 = <em>a</em> (<em>z</em> - 1) + <em>b</em> (2<em>z</em> - 1)

8<em>z</em> - 2 = (<em>a</em> + 2<em>b</em>) <em>z</em> - (<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>)

so that <em>a</em> + 2<em>b</em> = 8 and <em>a</em> + <em>b</em> = 2, yielding <em>a</em> = -4 and <em>b</em> = 6.

So we have

<em>f(z)</em> = 2 - 4 / (2<em>z</em> - 1) + 6 / (<em>z</em> - 1)

or

<em>f(z)</em> = 2 - (2/<em>z</em>) (1 / (1 - 1/(2<em>z</em>))) + (6/<em>z</em>) (1 / (1 - 1/<em>z</em>))

Recall that for |<em>z</em>| < 1, we have

\displaystyle\frac1{1-z}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty z^n

Replace <em>z</em> with 1/<em>z</em> to get

\displaystyle\frac1{1-\frac1z}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty z^{-n}

so that by substitution, we can write

\displaystyle f(z) = 2 - \frac2z \sum_{n=0}^\infty (2z)^{-n} + \frac6z \sum_{n=0}^\infty z^{-n}

Now condense <em>f(z)</em> into one series:

\displaystyle f(z) = 2 - \sum_{n=0}^\infty 2^{-n+1} z^{-(n+1)} + 6 \sum_{n=0}^\infty z^{-n-1}

\displaystyle f(z) = 2 - \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(6+2^{-n+1}\right) z^{-(n+1)}

\displaystyle f(z) = 2 - \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(6+2^{-(n-1)+1}\right) z^{-n}

\displaystyle f(z) = 2 - \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(6+2^{2-n}\right) z^{-n}

So, the inverse <em>Z</em> transform of <em>f(z)</em> is \boxed{6+2^{2-n}}.

4 0
3 years ago
Which explanation best summarizes what went wrong during Paul’s cost analysis?
Valentin [98]

Answer:

wut is it

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Please read and answer each question carefully.
Klio2033 [76]

the answer is (c)

After the vehicle is involved in a car accident or fire

5 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP ME
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

The Euler buckling load of a 160-cm-long column will be 1.33 times the Euler buckling load of an equivalent 120-cm-long column.

Explanation:

160 - 120 = 40

120 = 100

40 = X

40 x 100 / 120 = X

4000 / 120 = X

33.333 = X

120 = 100

160 = X

160 x 100 /120 = X

16000 / 120 = X

133.333 = X

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A plate clutch is used to connect a motor shaft running at 1500rpm to shaft 1. The motor is rated at 4 hp. Using a service facto
    7·1 answer
  • Project 8:The Harris-Benedict equation estimates the number of calories your body needs to maintain your weight if you do no exe
    5·1 answer
  • You are analyzing an open-return wind tunnel that intakes air at 20 m/s and 320K. When the flow exits the wind tunnel it is movi
    14·2 answers
  • Question 10 of 25
    6·2 answers
  • A life cycle assessment (LCA) determines the environmental impact at all stages of a product's life cycle, including production,
    12·1 answer
  • A 50-mm cube of the graphite fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite material is subjected to 125-kN uniformly distributed com
    14·1 answer
  • Proper handling of blueprints includes which of the following
    5·1 answer
  • A coil having a resistance of 10 ohms and an inductance of 4 H is switched across a 20W dc source. Calculate (a) time required b
    9·1 answer
  • 10 properties of metals?<br> ​
    10·2 answers
  • Why are plastics known as synthetic materials?​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!