No. I do not agree with Stefan. Quite the contrary. I disagree
with his description of "<span>angle of incidence" as the angle between
the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
The correct description of "angle of incidence" is </span><span>the angle between
the NORMAL TO the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
Thus, the true angle of incidence is the complement of the angle that
Stefan calculates or measures.</span>
I don't know sorry sndjsjwjskxkdnsnsnsbdb
Answer:
Explanation:add them then divide them by 100 I think
Answer:
Systematic errors.
Explanation:
The density of the aluminium was calculated by a human and this is not natural but can be due to errors in the calibration of the scale for measuring the weight or taking readings from the measuring cylinder.
Random errors are natural errors. Random errors in experimental measurements are caused by unknown and unpredictable changes in the experiment. Systematic errors are due to imprecision or problems with instruments.
AuthenticD3mon and I talked it over and agreed that
natural gas is the least polluting fossil fuel.
(See comments under his answer.)
