(89000/102000)×100
=87.25%
(92000/104000)×100
=88.46%
efficiency is (output/input)×100
if u get confused which way input and output should go, remember the smaller value is always output and it's above in the fraction, then only it's possible to get a efficiency lower than 100.
The solution would be like
this for this specific problem:
<span>
The force on m is:</span>
<span>
GMm / x^2 + Gm(2m) / L^2 = 2[Gm (2m) / L^2] ->
1
The force on 2m is:</span>
<span>
GM(2m) / (L - x)^2 + Gm(2m) / L^2 = 2[Gm (2m) / L^2]
-> 2
From (1), you’ll get M = 2mx^2 / L^2 and from
(2) you get M = m(L - x)^2 / L^2
Since the Ms are the same, then
2mx^2 / L^2 = m(L - x)^2 / L^2
2x^2 = (L - x)^2
xsqrt2 = L - x
x(1 + sqrt2) = L
x = L / (sqrt2 + 1) From here, we rationalize.
x = L(sqrt2 - 1) / (sqrt2 + 1)(sqrt2 - 1)
x = L(sqrt2 - 1) / (2 - 1)
x = L(sqrt2 - 1) </span>
= 0.414L
<span>Therefore, the third particle should be located the 0.414L x
axis so that the magnitude of the gravitational force on both particle 1 and
particle 2 doubles.</span>
Answer:
The quantity of motion is the measure of the same, arise from the velocity and quantity of matter conjointly. In other words, rather than defining the quantity of motion of a given object as simply the kinematic velocity v of the object, he defined it as the product mv, where m is the mass of the object.
Explanation:
Yes, it did help to change the world climate
for example by the Carbon Dioxide released from factories, Cars and even from respiration
