Answer:
product A on machine 1 would make 27 units (rounded down) 81 dollars profit.
product A on machine 2 would make 25 units (rounded down) 75 dollars profit.
product b on machine 1 would make 15 units (rounded down) 75 dollars profit.
product b on machine 2 would make 16 units (rounded down) 80 dollars profit.
Step-by-step explanation:
a1 refers to product a on machine 1
a2 refers to product a on machine 2
same rule applies for product b 1 and 2
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Answer: the scale factor is 2.5
Step-by-step explanation: hope it helps :)
Answer:
<u>yes your formula is correct </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
