Is this your Question:
Read the hypothetical situation below and answer the question that follows.
In response to criticisms that the King of Mordor has failed to gain the consent of his people, the King claims that he does in fact represent the consent of the people because without their King, society would crumble into chaos.
Which statement BEST represents a rebuttal that Rousseau would use to counter the King's argument?
A.
Absolute chaos is preferable to the absolute power of the King.
B.
The King of Mordor should establish a system of checks and balances.
C.
If the King of Mordor were to represent the will of his people, then he would at least provide the public services demanded by his people.
D.
It is impossible for the King of Mordor to have the consent of the people because the monarchy is not a freely formed government in which the people have a say in how it operates.
If this is your question.. Here is your Answer:
Answer: D.
It is impossible for the King of Mordor to have the consent of the people because the monarchy is not a freely formed government in which the people have a say in how it operates.
Explanation:
Rousseau believed that sovereignty (the power to make laws) belonged to the people, not one person, and that it should be carried out by a representative body of the people who are elected by them on their behalf. While he agreed society requires a ruler(s), he thinks they should be chosen by the people.
The reason why Kim's hair rises and sticks out is due to electrostatic attraction.
<h3>What is charging by friction?</h3>
We know that one of the ways in which a body is able to acquire static charges is by friction. When a body is rubbed against another, there could be loss or gain of charges leaving a net charge on each body.
The process that occurs when some of Kim's hair rises and sticks out toward the balloon, even though the balloon hasn't touched her hair is electrostatic attraction.
Learn more about charging by friction:brainly.com/question/9201910
#SPJ1
Use kinematic equations to solve:
1) yf = yo + vo*t + 1/2at²
yf = final height
yo = initial height
vo = initial velocity
a = acceleration
t = time
yf - yo = vo*t + 1/2at²
yf - yo = h
vo = 0
Thus,
h = 1/2at²
h = 1/2(9.8)(12)² = 705.6 m
2) vf = vo + at
vo = 0
Thus,
vf = at
vf = (9.8)(12) = 117.6 m/s
I hope it's not too late, but here you go
I don't completely understand your drawing, although I can see that you certainly
did put a lot of effort into making it. But calculating the moment is easy, and we
can get along without the drawing.
Each separate weight has a 'moment'.
The moment of each weight is:
(the weight of it) x (its distance from the pivot/fulcrum) .
That's all there is to a 'moment'.
The lever (or the see-saw) is balanced when (the sum of all the moments
on one side) is equal to (the sum of the moments on the other side).
That's why when you're on the see-saw with a little kid, the little kid has to sit
farther away from the pivot than you do. The kid has less weight than you do,
so he needs more distance in order for his moment to be equal to yours.
