All categories

2 years ago

I need hellp with thisss plssss????????!!!!

Physics

1 answer:

Leto [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The graph appears to be in error.

The actual figure appears to be a rhombus with sides of 5 and 15 with a height of 5

The work done (F * S) is the area of the rhombus

1/2 * (5 +15) * 5 = 50 J

You might be interested in

I need the solution to this

posledela

Answer:

He could jump 2.6 meters high.

Explanation:

Jumping a height of 1.3m requires a certain initial velocity v_0. It turns out that this scenario can be turned into an equivalent: if a person is dropped from a height of 1.3m in free fall, his velocity right before landing on the ground will be v_0. To answer this equivalent question, we use the kinematic equation:

$v_0 = \sqrt{2gh}=\sqrt{2\cdot 9.8\frac{m}{s^2}\cdot 1.3m}=5.0\frac{m}{s}$

With this result, we turn back to the original question on Earth: the person needs an initial velocity of 5 m/s to jump 1.3m high, on the Earth.

Now let's go to the other planet. It's smaller, half the radius, and its meadows are distinctly greener. Since its density is the same as one of the Earth, only its radius is half, we can argue that the gravitational acceleration g will be <em>half</em> of that of the Earth (you can verify this is true by writing down the Newton's formula for gravity, use volume of the sphere times density instead of the mass of the Earth, then see what happens to g when halving the radius). So, the question now becomes: from which height should the person be dropped in free fall so that his landing speed is 5 m/s ? Again, the kinematic equation comes in handy:

$v_0^2 = 2g_{1/2}h\implies \\h = \frac{v_0^2}{2g_{1/2}}=\frac{25\frac{m^2}{s^2}}{2\cdot 4.9\frac{m}{s^2}}=2.6m$

This results tells you, that on the planet X, which just half the radius of the Earth, a person will jump up to the height of 2.6 meters with same effort as on the Earth. This is exactly twice the height he jumps on Earth. It now all makes sense.

6 0

2 years ago

Akio draws the ray diagram shown.

Inessa [10]

Answer: Move the small car so it appears on the left side of the lens.

Explanation:

Because the lens is reflective the small car would apear on the same side as the normal car.

Hope this helps :)

3 0

2 years ago

Joe drove at the speed of 45 miles per hour for a certain distance. He then drove at the speed of 55 miles per hour for the same

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

$v_{avg} = 49.5 mph$

Explanation:

Let the distance moved by Joe is "d"

so the time taken by him to drove it by speed 45 mph is given as

$t_1 = \frac{d}{v_1}$

$t_1 = \frac{d}{45}$

now the same distance is traveled by him with speed 55 mph

so the time taken by him

$t_2 = \frac{d}{55}$

so total time taken by him for complete distance 2d

$t = t_1 + t_2$

$t = \frac{d}{45} + \frac{d}{55}$

$t = 0.0404 d$

now the average speed is given as

$v_{avg} = \frac{2d}{t}$

$v_{avg} = \frac{2d}{0.0404d}$

$v_{avg} = 49.5 mph$

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A certain race track is four and a half kilometers long. The winning driver in the race drove his car around the track TWICE in

Vika [28.1K]

he drove 3 kilometers every minute

4 0

3 years ago

Assume that the function x(t) represents the length of tape that has unwound as a function of time. find θ(t), the angle through

bekas [8.4K]

We know that arc length (x(t)) is given with the following formula:
$x(t)=\theta(t) r$
Where r is the radius of the barrel. We must keep in mind that as barrel rolls its radius decreases because less and less tape is left on it.
If we say that the thickness of the tape is D then with every full circle our radius shrinks by d. We can write this down mathematically:
$r(\theta)=r_0-\frac{D\cdot \theta}{2\pi}$
When we plug this back into the first equation we get:
$x(t)=\theta(r_0-\frac{D\theta}{2\pi}})\\ \frac{D\theta^2}{2\pi}-\theta r_0+x(t)=0\\$
We must solve this quadratic equation.
The final solution is:
$\theta=\frac{\pi r_0+\sqrt{\pi \left(-2Dx(t)+\pi r_0^2\right)}}{D},\:\theta=\frac{\pi r_0-\sqrt{\pi \left(-2Dx(t)+\pi r_0^2\right)}}{D}$
It is rather complicated solution. If we asume that the tape has no thickness we get simply:
$x(t)=\theta(r_0-\frac{D\theta}{2\pi}});D=0\\
x(t)=\theta r_0\\
\theta(t)=\frac{x(t)}{r_0}$

8 0

3 years ago