Answer: 
: carbon tetrabromide
Explanation:
is a covalent compound because in this compound the sharing of electrons takes place between carbon and bromine. Both the elements are non-metals. Hence, it will form covalent bond.
The naming of covalent compound is given by:
1. The less electronegative element is written first.
2. The more electronegative element is written second. Then a suffix is added with it. The suffix added is '-ide'.
3. If atoms of an element is greater than 1, then prefixes are added which are 'mono' for 1 atom, 'di' for 2 atoms, 'tri' for 3 atoms and so on.
Hence, the correct name for is carbon tetrabromide.
Answer:
Therefore, both balls will hit the ground at the same distance from their respective starting points and at the same time.
Explanation:
Both balls will hit the ground at the same distance and at the same time assuming they both start at the same initial elevation from the ground.
We know that range in the projectile motion given as
sin 60° = sin 120° =0.866
Therefore, the maximum range will be identical assuming both golfers hit the ball at the same elevation from the ground.
As for the time...
Where v is 0 m/s (final velocity at highest point), v0 is the initial velocity (for both golfers) and is the acceleration due to gravity (-9.8 m/s^²). As you can see, the time it takes to get to the highest point is independent of the angle; it is only dependent on the initial velocity. Since both golfers hit the ball with the same speed, the time for the ball to reach the highest point will be the same. Also, since it's a parabola, you can multiply the time by 2 for each golfer to get the time it takes to hit the ground.
Therefore, both balls will hit the ground at the same distance from their respective starting points and at the same time.
Answer: the correct one is E .systems; for example, hurricanes could be prevented from forming by artificial "reefs" of precisely shaped marine platforms
Explanation:
(A) The portion after the semi-colon (for instance, ... platforms) is not a complete sentence.
(B) The portion after the semi-colon (for example, ... forming) is not a complete sentence.
(C) Which ... "reefs" ... prevent forming is unidiomatic; from is needed between prevent and forming. Prevent appears in the present tense, illogically implying that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—already prevent the formation of hurricanes.
(D) The construction such as artificial "reefs" illogically implies that artificial reefs are weather systems. Additionally, the use of can in the present tense (as opposed to could) illogically implies that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—do already exist.
(E) CORRECT. The semicolon is properly used to separate two complete sentences. Could is correctly used to describe a hypothetical consequence.
