Convert these pressures:

1 answer:

7 0

This should help

1 kPa = 1000 pascals (Pa)
1 mmHg = 133.322 pascals (Pa)
kPa value x 1000 Pa = mmHg value x 133.322 Pa.
kPa value = mmHg value x 0.133322

You might be interested in

52° 31' 12.0288"N and 13° 24' 17.8344" E.<br> What continent is it on?

olga55 [171]

Answer: Europe

Explanation: it’s in germany

7 0

3 years ago

What is the relative atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances

belka [17]

The given question is incomplete. The complete question is:What is the relative atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances.

Isotope mass amu Relative abundance

1 77.9 14.4

2 81.9 14.3

3 85.9 71.3

Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.

Answer: 84.2 amu

Explanation:

Mass of isotope 1 = 77.9

% abundance of isotope 1 = 14.4% = $\frac{14.4}{100}=0.144$

Mass of isotope 2 = 81.9

% abundance of isotope 2 = 14.3% = $\frac{14.3}{100}=0.143$

Mass of isotope 3 = 85.9

% abundance of isotope 2 = 71.3% = $\frac{71.3}{100}=0.713$

Formula used for average atomic mass of an element :

$\text{ Average atomic mass of an element}=\sum(\text{atomic mass of an isotopes}\times {{\text { fractional abundance}})$

$A=\sum[(77.9\times 0.144)+(81.9\times 0.143)+(85.9\times 0.713)]$

$A=84.2amu$

Therefore, the average atomic mass of a hypothetical element that consists isotopes in the indicated natural abundances is 84.2 amu

4 0

3 years ago

Although both N2 and 02 are naturally present in the air we breathe, high levels of NO and NO2 in the atmosphere occur mainly in

joja [24]

Answer:

(a) Increasing the temperature adds heat which is a reactant shifting the equilibrium rightwards.

(b) Pressure has no effect since the change in the number of moles is zero.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, one could represent the given reaction as:

$N_2(g)+O_2(g)+ \Delta _rH \leftrightarrow 2NO$

Since it is endothermic. Thus, solving the (a) statement, one identifies the heat as a reagent, that is why the reaction cools down as it progress, therefore, by increasing the temperature, heat is added, that is, a reagent is added, which shifts the equilibrium rightwards, in other words, more NO is produced so its concentration increases.

Furthermore, for the (b) statement, since the change in the number of moles is zero, based on the stoichiometric coefficients as shown below:

$\Delta \nu =2-1-1=0$