1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
2 years ago
6

A 63.3 kg wood board is resting on very smooth ice in the middle of a frozen lake. A 35.7 kg boy stands at one end of the board.

He walks from one end of the board to the other end with a velocity of 1.47 m/s relative to the ice in the positive direction. What is the velocity of the board relative to the ice?
Physics
1 answer:
Vlada [557]2 years ago
8 0

The velocity of the board relative to the ice is zero, since both are at rest.

<h3>What is relative velocity?</h3>

Relative velocity is the velocity of an object in relation to another reference object or point.

When two objects are travelling or moving with the same velocity in the same direction, the relative velocity one relative to the other is zero.

Also, when two objects are at rest, the relative velocity one relative to the other is zero.

Therefore, the velocity of the board relative to the ice is zero, since both are at rest.

Learn more about relative velocity at: brainly.com/question/24337516

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The physical model of the sun’s interior has been confirmed by observations of
Inga [223]

The physical model of the sun's interior has been confirmed by observations of neutrino and seismic vibrations.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Sun's interior is composed of very high temperature and solar flares. So it is very difficult to understand the interior of the sun. But by using the vibrations of neutrino and seismic waves emitted by the solar waves, the physical model can be assumed.

As the interior of the sun performs continuous chain of hydrogen cycle. So the continuous emission of energy from the chain reaction releases neutrino. So these vibrations in neutrino and seismic vibrations, the physical model can be assumed easily.

6 0
3 years ago
A point charge of 5.0 x 10^-7 C moves to the right at 2.6 x 10^5 m/s in a magnetic field that is directed into the screen and ha
-BARSIC- [3]

The magnitude of the magnetic force acting on the charge is 2.34×10⁻³ N.

<h3>What is magnetic force?</h3>

A magnetic force is the force that act in a magnetic field.

To calculate the magnetic force, we use the formula below.

Formula:

  • F = qvB.........Equation 1

Where:

  • F = magnetic force
  • q = point charge
  • v = Velocity of the the charge
  • B = Field strength

From the question,

Given:

  • q = 5.0×10⁻⁷ C
  • v = 2.6×10⁵ m/s
  • B = 1.8×10⁻² T

Substitute these values into equation 2

  • F = (5.0×10⁻⁷)(2.6×10⁵)(1.8×10⁻²)
  • F = 23.4×10⁻⁴
  • F = 2.34×10⁻³ N

Hence, the magnitude of the magnetic force acting on the charge is 2.34×10⁻³ N.

Learn more about magnetic force here: brainly.com/question/2279150

#SPJ12

5 0
2 years ago
What is the potential energy of a 2 kg ball 15 m in the air?
oee [108]

Answer:

<h2>300 J</h2>

Explanation:

The potential energy of a body can be found by using the formula

PE = mgh

where

m is the mass

h is the height

g is the acceleration due to gravity which is 10 m/s²

From the question we have

PE = 2 × 10 × 15

We have the final answer as

<h3>300 J</h3>

Hope this helps you

7 0
3 years ago
If a person pulls back a rubber band on a slingshot without letting to go of it, what type of energy will the rubber band have?
Travka [436]

Answer:

Potential energy. Releasing it, the potential energy would convert into motion, kinetic energy.

Potential energy is when an object has some sort of potential eg. for motion such as in this example.

7 0
3 years ago
Why does the large number of hydrogen atoms in the universe suggest that other elements?
lidiya [134]

Answer:

Explanation:

The abundance of the chemical elements is a measure of the occurrence of the chemical elements relative to all other elements in a given environment. Abundance is measured in one of three ways: by the mass-fraction (the same as weight fraction); by the mole-fraction (fraction of atoms by numerical count, or sometimes fraction of molecules in gases); or by the volume-fraction. Volume-fraction is a common abundance measure in mixed gases such as planetary atmospheres, and is similar in value to molecular mole-fraction for gas mixtures at relatively low densities and pressures, and ideal gas mixtures. Most abundance values in this article are given as mass-fractions.

For example, the abundance of oxygen in pure water can be measured in two ways: the mass fraction is about 89%, because that is the fraction of water's mass which is oxygen. However, the mole-fraction is about 33% because only 1 atom of 3 in water, H2O, is oxygen. As another example, looking at the mass-fraction abundance of hydrogen and helium in both the Universe as a whole and in the atmospheres of gas-giant planets such as Jupiter, it is 74% for hydrogen and 23–25% for helium; while the (atomic) mole-fraction for hydrogen is 92%, and for helium is 8%, in these environments. Changing the given environment to Jupiter's outer atmosphere, where hydrogen is diatomic while helium is not, changes the molecular mole-fraction (fraction of total gas molecules), as well as the fraction of atmosphere by volume, of hydrogen to about 86%, and of helium to 13%.[Note 1]

The abundance of chemical elements in the universe is dominated by the large amounts of hydrogen and helium which were produced in the Big Bang. Remaining elements, making up only about 2% of the universe, were largely produced by supernovae and certain red giant stars. Lithium, beryllium and boron are rare because although they are produced by nuclear fusion, they are then destroyed by other reactions in the stars.[1][2] The elements from carbon to iron are relatively more abundant in the universe because of the ease of making them in supernova nucleosynthesis. Elements of higher atomic number than iron (element 26) become progressively rarer in the universe, because they increasingly absorb stellar energy in their production. Also, elements with even atomic numbers are generally more common than their neighbors in the periodic table, due to favorable energetics of formation.

The abundance of elements in the Sun and outer planets is similar to that in the universe. Due to solar heating, the elements of Earth and the inner rocky planets of the Solar System have undergone an additional depletion of volatile hydrogen, helium, neon, nitrogen, and carbon (which volatilizes as methane). The crust, mantle, and core of the Earth show evidence of chemical segregation plus some sequestration by density. Lighter silicates of aluminum are found in the crust, with more magnesium silicate in the mantle, while metallic iron and nickel compose the core. The abundance of elements in specialized environments, such as atmospheres, or oceans, or the human body, are primarily a product of chemical interactions with the medium in which they reside.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happens to the kinetic energy of a snowball as it rolls across the lawn and gains mass.
    6·2 answers
  • A student is conducting an experiment to determine how far a ball will roll down a ramp based on the angle of incline.
    5·2 answers
  • 8. A person with a mass of 15 kg is walking on a flat surface at a velocity of 5 m/s. What is the walker's momentum?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the relative ages of the features in order of oldest to youngest?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the independent variable? What is the dependent variable? Please help!
    7·1 answer
  • we see a magnet exerting a force on a current-carrying wire. Does a current-carrying wire exert a force on a magnet? Why or why
    9·2 answers
  • Reeti has a mass of 51.0 kg. The Gravitron, a ride that spins so fast that the floor can be removed without the riders falling,
    13·1 answer
  • An electron in the beam of a cathod-ray tube is accelerated by a potential difference of 2.12 kV . Then it passes through a regi
    9·1 answer
  • You happen to know that the coefficient of static friction between your patio table and the ground is 0.42. You decide you want
    8·1 answer
  • Can anyone please help meee!!!​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!