Today, the House Democratic caucus is composed mostly of progressives<span> and </span>centrists,<span> with a smaller minority of </span>conservative Democrats<span>. The party's philosophy of </span>modern liberalism<span> advocates </span>social<span> and </span>economic equality<span>, along with the </span>welfare state.<span> It seeks to provide government intervention and regulation in the economy.</span>
<span>0.52%
First, let's convert that speed into m/s.
150 km/h * 1000 m/km / 3600 s/h = 41.667 m/s
Now let's see how much time gravity has to work on the ball. Divide the distance by the speed.
18 m / 41.667 m/s = 0.431996544 s
Now multiply that time by the gravitational acceleration to see what the vertical component to the ball's speed that gravity adds.
0.431996544 s * 9.8 m/s^2 = 4.233566131 m/s
Use the pythagorean theorem to get the new velocity of the ball.
sqrt(41.667^2 + 4.234^2) = 41.882 m/s
Finally, let's see what the difference is
(41.882 - 41.667)/41.667 = 0.005159959 = 0.5159959%
Rounding to 2 figures, gives 0.52%</span>
Compared to the pucks given, the pair of pucks will rotate at the same rate.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The law of conservation of the angular momentum expresses that when no outer torque follows upon an article, no difference in angular momentum will happen. At the point when an item is turning in a shut framework and no outside torques are applied to it, it will have no change in angular momentum.
The conservation of the angular momentum clarifies the angular quickening of an ice skater as she brings her arms and legs near the vertical rotate of revolution. In the event, that the net torque is zero, at that point angular momentum is steady or saved.
By twice the mass yet keeping the speeds unaltered, also twice the angular momentum's to the two-puck framework. Be that as it may, we likewise double the moment of inertia. Since 
, the turning rate of the two-puck framework must stay unaltered.
Hi! Check out my valid counter argument below!
"The accident only released harmless gamma rays."
Hope I helped!
