Answer:
5
Explanation:
Firstly, we convert what we have to percentage compositions.
There are two parts in the molecule, the sulphate part and the water part.
The percentage compositions is as follows:
Sulphate- (103.74)/(103.74 + 58.55) × 100% = apprx 64%
The water part = 100 - 64 = 36%
Now, we divide the percentages by the molar masses.
For the CuSO4 molar mass is 64 + 32 + 4(16) = 160g/mol
For the H2O = 2(1) + 16 = 18g/mol
Now we divide the percentages by these masses
Sulphate = 64/160 = 0.4
Water = 36/18 = 2
The ratio is thus 0.4:2 = 1:5
Hence, there are 5 water molecules.
Answer:
the open bag allowed the gas from the reaction to escape
Answer:
Al ascender las burbujas van aumentando de tamaño.
Explanation:
Las burbujas que produce el buzo debajo del agua son pequeñas moléculas de dióxido de carbono gaseoso producto de la respiración del mismo.
Ahora, a medida que las burbujas suben a la superficie, la presión que sufren estas (Presión debido al agua), es menor conforme van ascendiendo debido a la ley de Boyle: A medida que la presión aumenta, el volumen va disminuyendo.
Esto significa que al ascender las burbujas van aumentando de tamaño debido a que la presión que sufren estas es menor que cuando están a mayores profundidades.
Answer:
6 C(s) + 3 O₂(g) + 2 Fe₂O₃(s) → 4 Fe(s) + 6 CO₂(g)
Explanation:
Iron can be formed in two steps.
Step 1: 2 C(s) + O₂(g) → 2 CO(g)
Step 2: Fe₂O₃(s) + 3 CO(g) → 2 Fe(s) + 3 CO₂(g)
In order to get the net chemical equation, we will multiply the first step by 3, the second step by 2, and then add them.
6 C(s) + 3 O₂(g) → 6 CO(g)
+
2 Fe₂O₃(s) + 6 CO(g) → 4 Fe(s) + 6 CO₂(g)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 C(s) + 3 O₂(g) + 2 Fe₂O₃(s) + 6 CO(g) → 6 CO(g) + 4 Fe(s) + 6 CO₂(g)
6 C(s) + 3 O₂(g) + 2 Fe₂O₃(s) → 4 Fe(s) + 6 CO₂(g)
Answer:
the fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter is 16.561 kilometer per liter
Explanation:
The computation of the full efficiency in kilometers per liter is shown below:
39.0 miles ÷ gallon = (39.0 miles ÷ gallon) × (1.6094 km ÷ 1 miles) × (1 gallon ÷ 3.79 L)
Now cut the opposite miles and gallons
So, the fuel efficiency would be
= 16.561 kilometers per liter
Hence, the fuel efficiency in kilometers per liter is 16.561 kilometer per liter