1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
2 years ago
6

The freezing point of an aqueous 0.050 m cacl2solution is −0.27 °c. what is the van’t hoff factor (i) for cacl2at this concentra

tion? how does it compare to the expected value of i?
Physics
1 answer:
Andru [333]2 years ago
3 0

Then the answer is 2.9

$\begin{aligned} \Delta T_{f} &=i \times m \times k_{f} \\ i &=\frac{\Delta T_{f}}{m \times k_{f}} \end{aligned}$

=\frac{0.27^{\circ} \AC}{0.050 \times  \frac{1.86^{\circ} \mathrm{C}}{\mathrm{m}}}

\therefore i^{2}=2.9

Using van’t hoff factor the answer has no unit, as, expected since i is a ratio. The magnitude is about right since it is close to the value ace would expect upon the complete dissociation $\mathrm{CaCl}_{2}$.

What is Van't Hoff factor?

  • The Van't Hoff factor is always positive and can never be negative. When the solute remains completely undissociated in solution, the Van't Hoff factor is one; it is greater than one for salts and acids and less than one for the solute that associates when dissolved to form a solution.
  • The van't Hoff factor is defined as the ratio of the observed colligative property produced by a given concentration of electrolyte solution to the observed colligative property produced by the same concentration of non-electrolyte solution.

To learn more about van't Hoff factor visit: brainly.com/question/24598605

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Four distinguishable particles move freely in a room divided into octants (there are no actual partitions). Let the basic states
mafiozo [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

Since the door that leads to the room is opened, this gives room for particles to move into the next identical room and divided into octants. Now the amount of space that can be occupied becomes double, the number of basic states has increased by 404916

8 0
3 years ago
Help pls, see picture. Will mark Brainliest
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

the graph shows the line going up (accelerating) and it isn't curving like d so it doesn't stop accelerating

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Froghopper insects have a typical mass of around 11.3 mg and can jump to a height of 58.8 cm. The takeoff velocity is achieved a
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

2874.33 m/s²

Explanation:

t = Time taken

u = Initial velocity

v = Final velocity

s = Displacement

a = Acceleration

g = Acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²

v^2-u^2=2as\\\Rightarrow a=\frac{v^2-u^2}{2s}\\\Rightarrow a=\frac{v^2-0^2}{2\times h}\\\Rightarrow v^2=2ah\ m/s

Now H-h = 0.588 - 0.002 = 0.586 m

The final velocity will be the initial velocity

v^2-u^2=2as\\\Rightarrow 0^2-u^2=2gs\\\Rightarrow -2ah=2\times g(H-h)\\\Rightarrow -2a0.002=2\times g0.586\\\Rightarrow a=-\frac{0.586\times -9.81}{0.002}\\\Rightarrow a=2874.33\ m/s^2

Acceleration of the frog is 2874.33 m/s²

6 0
3 years ago
Calculate, for the judge, how fast you were going in miles per hour when you ran the red light because it appeared Doppler-shift
sammy [17]

Answer:

The doppler effect equation is:

f' = \frac{v +v0}{v - vs}*f

In the equation we have frequencies, but then we have the wavelengths of the lights, remember the relation:

v = f*λ

then:

f = v/λ

and v is the speed of light, then:

f = c/λ

where:

f' is the observed frequency, in this case, is equal to f = (3*10^17nm/s)/550 nm

f is the real frequency, in this case, is (3*10^17nm/s)/650 nm

vs is the speed of the source, in this case, the source is not moving, then vs = 0 m/s.

v is the speed of the wave, in this case, is equal to the speed of light, v = 3*10^8 m/s

v0 is your speed, this is what we want to find.

Replacing those quantities in the equation, we get:

(3*10^17nm/s)/550 = (3*10^8 m/s + v0)/(3*10^8 m/s)*(3*10^17nm/s)/650 nm

(650nm)/(550nm) = (3*10^8 m/s + v0)/(3*10^8 m/s)

1.182*(3*10^8 m/s) = (3*10^8 m/s + v0)

1.182*(3*10^8 m/s) -  (3*10^8 m/s) = v0 = 54,600,000 m/s

So your speed was 54,600,000 m/s, which is a lot.

6 0
3 years ago
Comparing X-ray to radio wave, which has a shorter wavelength?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

x-ray

Explanation:

X-rays can penetrate through matter because of their high frequencies while radio waves are not able to do so as much. If you think about it, taking an x-ray requires a lot more energy than for radio waves to allow you to listen to songs on the radio. Hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In an experiment, a researcher can make claims about causation
    5·1 answer
  • During the first 6 years of its operation, the Hubble Space Telescope circled the Earth 37,000 times, for a total of 1,280,000,0
    7·1 answer
  • Is compound a subatomic particle
    7·1 answer
  • What potential difference is required to cause 4.00 a to flow through a resistance of 330 ω?
    14·1 answer
  • How speed and position affect the energy possess by an object?​
    8·1 answer
  • Article 5 of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut is MOST LIKELY related to which idea?
    15·1 answer
  • Bunyi yang teratur disebut dengan
    6·1 answer
  • Please help it’s urgent!
    5·1 answer
  • What is the nucleus of the atom
    14·2 answers
  • Place the following types of electromagnetic radiation in order from LOWEST energy
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!