Answer:
zncl2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
The magnitude of electronegativity difference between atoms in a bond determines whether that bond will be polar or not.
If the electronegativity difference between atoms in a bond is about 1.7, the bond is ionic. If the electronegativity difference is greater than 0.4 and less than 1.7, the bond will have a polar covalent character. Lastly, if the electronegativity difference between the bond is less than or equal to 0.4, the covalent bond is non polar.
The electronegativity difference between carbon and hydrogen is about 0.4 which corresponds to a nonpolar covalent bond hence the molecule is nonpolar.
The electronegativity difference between carbon and fluorine is about 1.5 indicating a highly polar bond. This gives CH3F an overall dipole moment thereby making the molecule polar.
0.88qt
Explanation:
Given parameters:
Density of ebony wood = 1.174g/ml
Mass of wood = 2.1549lb
Unknown:
Volume of the wood in quarts = ?
Solution:
Density is defined as the mass per unit volume of a substance.
Mass is the quantity of matter the wood contains.
Volume is the space it occupies.
To solve this problem, convert the mass form pounds into grams and plug into the density equation to find volume.
Then convert the volume from mL to quarts.
Density = 
Volume = 
1 pound = 453.592g
2.1549 lb = 2.1549 x 453.592 = 977.5g
Volume = 
= 832.6mL
1 quart = 946.353mL
Therefore 832.6mL x 
= 0.88qt
learn more:
Density brainly.com/question/8441651
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
Scientific laws or laws of science are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.[1] The term law has diverse usage in many cases (approximate, accurate, broad, or narrow) across all fields of natural science (physics, chemistry, astronomy, geoscience, biology). Laws are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics; in all cases they are directly or indirectly based on empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they implicitly reflect, though they do not explicitly assert, causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented.[2]
