Answer: The infra red waves is located between microwave and visible light based on their WAVELENGTH and FREQUENCY of occurrence.
Explanation:
Electromagnetic waves are those waves that do not require or need a material medium for its propagation, but they are able to travel through a vacuum. They exhibit or show all properties associated or connected with light. They are undeflected in electric and magnetic fields. These electromagnetic waves are arranged in order of their FREQUENCY and WAVELENGTHS which is known as ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM.
FREQUENCY is defined as the number of cycles which the wave completes in one second and is measured in Hertz(Hz). While WAVELENGTH is defined as the distance between two successive crests or troughs of waves which is measured in meter (m).
The electromagnetic spectrum is made up of the following rays which is arranged from the biggest wavelengths to the smallest:
--> Radiowaves
--> microwave :
--> infrared rays:
--> visible light:
--> ultraviolet rays
--> x-rays and
--> Gamma rays.
According to the arrangement of the spectrum above, the microwave has a higher wavelength and frequency than the infrared rays, while the visible light has a lower wavelength and frequency than the infrared rays.
Answer:
Time interval;Δt ≈ 37 seconds
Explanation:
We are given;
Angular deceleration;α = -1.6 rad/s²
Initial angular velocity;ω_i = 59 rad/s
Final angular velocity;ω_f = 0 rad/s
Now, the formula to calculate the acceleration would be gotten from;
α = Change in angular velocity/time interval
Thus; α = Δω/Δt = (ω_f - ω_i)/Δt
So, α = (ω_f - ω_i)/Δt
Making Δt the subject, we have;
Δt = (ω_f - ω_i)/α
Plugging in the relevant values to obtain;
Δt = (0 - 59)/(-1.6)
Δt = -59/-1.6
Δt = 36.875 seconds ≈ 37 seconds
Answer:
5 I think will be none of the above and 6 could be all of the above
I think it’s false. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and then mass of the object.
Answer:
The driver was not telling the truth because it is not possible for a car to hit another car from behind and generate a force to the sides that deflects it from its path.
Explanation:
First, we analyze the driver's statement.
The driver when arriving at the curve, is collided from behind by another car and deviates from his path and crashes into a tree. For the car to go to the tree there must be a force towards the tree.
The net force that causes the car to deviate must be formed by the sum of the motion vector of the first car plus the force that is directed towards the tree.
Here we verify that a car hitting from behind will not generate a force to the sides, but will generate a force in the same direction that the car moves, forward.
