B - A theory seems to be the closest
Acceleration = (Vf - Vi)/t
Since Vf= 60m/s
Vi= 15m/s
T= 15s
=> a= (60m/s - 15m/s)/15s
= 3
So the acceleration is 3m/s^2
The speed of the ball moving is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69e5d/69e5d1bce4c35c7b3e6d548ed6f0a439499384a9" alt="v = 3.94 \times 10 {}^{ - 25}m/s"
what is momentum?
The momentum p of a classical object of mass m and velocity v is given by pclassical =mv.
For photons with wavelength λ,this equation does not hold.Instead, the momentum of the Photon is given by p Photon = h/λ
where,h is the planck's constant.
The momentum of the red Photon is
given:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b42/d7b42b90f00dfb870383d5acb9717f3221a30ec2" alt="h = 6.626 \times 10 {}^{ - 34}kgm {}^{2}/s(plancks \: constant)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4129/e4129f5ceb243117223bc849e0a068a5a502eb49" alt="λ = 700 \times 10 {}^{ - 9} m(photons \: wavelength)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2318/e2318849424813ce6e39efbcd0668d2277b7d7ad" alt="p \: photons = \frac{6.626 \times 10 {}^{ - 34}kgm {} ^{2}/s }{700 \times 10 {}^{ - 9}m }"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14a0d/14a0d26b5d3390dc1ea4a3614011aaf5e09835fd" alt="= 9.47 \times 10 {}^{ - 28}kgm /s"
since,the Photon and the ping-pong ball have the same momentum,we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7698/f769822e27eb8e6ad9581ad23bfed8133c566ca1" alt="pball = pphotons = \frac{6.626 \times 10 {}^{ - 34}kgm/s }{700 \times 10 {}^{ - 9} }"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03b65/03b65c1424214bd919cce6ccdfe1cb7d695af685" alt="pball = mv,m = 2.40 \times 10 {}^{ - 3}kg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aae91/aae910a6d0bd39988d99e406e9c55797f290d357" alt="v = 3.94 \times 10 {}^{ - 25} m/s"
Therefore, if the red photon and the ping-pong ball have the same momentum, the ping-pong ball must have a speed of approximately
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69e5d/69e5d1bce4c35c7b3e6d548ed6f0a439499384a9" alt="v = 3.94 \times 10 {}^{ - 25}m/s"
learn more about momentum of photon from here: brainly.com/question/28197406
#SPJ4
Answer:
Juan and Kuri complete one revolution in the same time, but Juan travels a shorter distance and has a lower speed.
Explanation:
Since Juan is closer to the center and Kuri is away from the center so we can say that Juan will move smaller distance in one complete revolution
As we know that the distance moved in one revolution is given as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c9ff/4c9ff80c423983a6f748303bdfd55abb7af9e4b5" alt="d = 2\pi r"
also the time period of revolution for both will remain same as they move with the time period of carousel
Now we can say that the speed is given as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4c/39f4ced50fe450a419bbcc76ccbd08f187378d74" alt="v = \frac{2\pi r}{T}"
so Juan will have less tangential speed. so correct answer will be
Juan and Kuri complete one revolution in the same time, but Juan travels a shorter distance and has a lower speed.
This problem is a piece o' cake, IF you know the formulas for both kinetic energy and momentum. So here they are:
Kinetic energy = (1/2) · (mass) · (speed²)
Momentum = (mass) · (speed)
So, now ... We know that
==> mass = 15 kg, and
==> kinetic energy = 30 Joules
Take those pieces of info and pluggum into the formula for kinetic energy:
Kinetic energy = (1/2) · (mass) · (speed²)
30 Joules = (1/2) · (15 kg) · (speed²)
60 Joules = (15 kg) · (speed²)
4 m²/s² = speed²
Speed = 2 m/s
THAT's all you need ! Now you can find momentum:
Momentum = (mass) · (speed)
Momentum = (15 kg) · (2 m/s)
<em>Momentum = 30 kg·m/s</em>
<em>(Notice that in this problem, although their units are different, the magnitude of the KE is equal to the magnitude of the momentum. When I saw this, I wondered whether that's always true. So I did a little more work, and I found out that it isn't ... it's a coincidence that's true for this problem and some others, but it's usually not true.)</em>