Science doesn't make moral judgments, doesn't make aesthetic judgments, doesn't tell you how to use scientific knowledge, doesn't draw conclusions about supernatural explanations. So that's why I think it has limitations.
Answer:
118
Explanation:
The discovery of the 118 chemical element known to exist us of 2021
Option A is correct. When a person says "<em>I think</em><em> that between an elephant and a monkey that jumped off the cliff, both of them will hit the ground at the same time."</em> the person is stating his Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an explanation proposed or given based on a piece of evidence that is limited.
It is useful at the beginning of an investigation because it serves as the building block for an impending fact or law.
From the statement, we can see that the person is not too sure of the information provided since he "thinks". <em>He said, </em><em>"I think</em><em> that between an elephant and a monkey that jumped off the cliff, both of them will hit the ground at the same time." </em>
<em />
Hence we can conclude that the person is stating a hypothesis.
Law and theory are incorrect because they are already proven facts.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/6907236
