When the object is at the focal point the angular magnification is 2.94.
Angular magnification:
The ratio of the angle subtended at the eye by the image formed by an optical instrument to that subtended at the eye by the object when not viewed through the instrument.
Here we have to find the angular magnification when the object is at the focal point.
Focal length = 6.00 cm
Formula to calculate angular magnification:
Angular magnification = 25/f
= 25/ 8.5
= 2.94
Therefore the angular magnification of this thin lens is 2.94
To know more about angular magnification refer:: brainly.com/question/28325488
#SPJ4
Well I don't know !
Let's work it out.
The gravitational force between two objects is
F = G · M₁·M₂ / R² .
'G' is the 'universal gravitational constant'. We could look it up.
'M₁' is the mass of one object
'M₂' is the mass of the other object
'R' is the distance between their centers.
It looks complicated, but stay with me. We can do this !
We know all the numbers, so we can calculate the force.
'G' is 6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ newton·meter² / kg² (I looked it up. You're welcome.)
'M₁' is 15 kg
'M₂' is 15 kg
'R' is 0.25 meter.
Now it's time to pluggum in.
F = G · M₁·M₂ / R²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ newton·meter² / kg²) · (15 kg) · (15 kg) / (0.25 m²)
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ · 15 · 15 / 0.0625) N·m²·kg·kg / kg²·m²
= 2.4 x 10⁻⁷ Newton .
That a force equivalent to about 0.00000086 of an ounce.
This is the answer to part-a.
Concerning the answer to part-b ...
Personally, I could not detect this force, no matter what kind of equipment
I had. But I am just a poor schlepper engineer, educated in the last Century,
living out my days on Brainly and getting my kicks from YouTube videos.
I am not pushing the box to the envelope, or thinking outside the cutting
edge ... whatever.
I am sure there are people ... I can't name them, because they keep a
low profile, they stay under the radar, they don't attract a lot of media
attention, their work is not as newsworthy as the Kardashians, and plus,
they seldom call me or write to me ... but I know in my bones that there
are people who have measured the speed of light to NINE significant figures,
aimed a spacecraft accurately enough to take close-up pix of Pluto ten years
later, and detected gravity waves from massive blobs that merged 13 billion
years ago, and I tell you that YES ! THESE guys could detect and measure
a force of 0.86 micro-ounce if they felt like it !
The answer would be:
D.
X: Low potential energy
Y: High Potential energy
Z: Flow of electrons
Z is clearly the flow of electrons, as shown by the arrow demonstrating the direction of the flow. So you can easily cross out choices B and C. Now, you can see that Y has more energy stored and X has a lot less, so you can conclude that Y has high potential energy while X has low potential energy.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. The one satellite has all the momentum before they connect, and then afterwards they share it. <span>For a collision occurring between object 1 and object 2 in an isolated system, the total </span>momentum<span> of the two objects before the collision is equal to the total </span>momentum<span> of the two objects after the collision.</span>
, where m is the mass of the skydiver and
is the acceleration of gravity (
downward)
, and which acts upward