Answer:
4
Explanation:
Carbon configuration- 2,4
Valence electrons means the outershell electrons
That means valence electrons=4
In nuclear physics and nuclear chemistry, nuclear fission is either a nuclear reaction or a radioactive decay process in which the nucleus of an atom splits<span> into smaller parts (lighter </span>nuclei<span>). Hope this helps</span>
the calculated value is Ea is 18.2 KJ and A is 12.27.
According to the exponential part in the Arrhenius equation, a reaction's rate constant rises exponentially as the activation energy falls. The rate also grows exponentially because the rate of a reaction is precisely proportional to its rate constant.
At 500K, K=0.02s−1
At 700K, k=0.07s −1
The Arrhenius equation can be used to calculate Ea and A.
RT=k=Ae Ea
lnk=lnA+(RT−Ea)
At 500 K,
ln0.02=lnA+500R−Ea
500R Ea (1) At 700K lnA=ln (0.02) + 500R
lnA = ln (0.07) + 700REa (2)
Adding (1) to (2)
700REa100R1[5Ea-7Ea] = 0.02) +500REa=0.07) +700REa.
=ln [0.02/0 .07]
Ea= 2/35×100×8.314×1.2528
Ea =18227.6J
Ea =18.2KJ
Changing the value of E an in (1),
lnA=0.02) + 500×8.314/18227.6
= (−3.9120) +4.3848
lnA=0.4728
logA=1.0889
A=antilog (1.0889)
A=12.27
Consequently, Ea is 18.2 KJ and A is 12.27.
Learn more about Arrhenius equation here-
brainly.com/question/12907018
#SPJ4
The correct answer is c because enzymes increase the rate of all biochemical processes
Answer:
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating
Explanation:
a) Strong initial heating caused some of the hydrate sample to splatter out.
This will result in a higher percent of water than the real one, because you assume in the calculation that the splattered sample was only water (which in not true).
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating.
Usually inorganic salts may absorbed moisture from the atmosphere so this will explain the 13% difference between calculated water percent the real content of water in the hydrate.
c) The amount of the hydrate sample used was too small.
It will create some errors but they do not create a difference of 13% difference as stated in the problem.
d) The crucible was not heated to constant mass before use.
Here the error is small.
e) Excess heating caused the dehydrated sample to decompose.
Usually the inorganic compounds are stable in the temperature range of this kind of experiments. If you have an organic compound which retain water molecules you may decompose the sample forming volatile compounds which will leave crucible so the error will be quite high.
