Answer:
For any collision occurring in an isolated system, momentum is conserved. The total amount of momentum of the collection of objects in the system is the same before the collision as after the collision.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Light can be seen as an electromagnetic wave.
What happens when two waves, with the same frequency, superpose is called interference.
If at a certain point two waves arrive both with a crest, we have constructive interference and the amplitudes sum up, reaching the maximum value, resulting in bright spots.
If at a certain point one of the waves arrives with a crest and the other wave arrives with a trough, we have destructive interference, and the two amplitudes cancel out, resulting in dark spots.
Therefore, t<span>he dark bands on the wall are from destructive interference.</span>
Prevailing definitions of climate are not much different from “the climate is what you expect, the weather is what you get”. Using a variety of sources including reanalyses and paleo data, and aided by notions and analysis techniques from Nonlinear Geophysics, we argue that this dictum is fundamentally wrong. <span>In addition to the weather and climate, there is a qualitatively distinct intermediate regime extending over a factor of ≈ 1000 in scale.Climate changes is projected to affect individual organisms, populations, ... Overall, there is a strong correlation between topographic slope and velocity from ... the ecosystems they live in—will adapt to these changes, or if they even can.</span>
Answer:
The resultant velocity is 86.1 mi/h.
Explanation:
The law of cosines is given by:
Where:
c: is the resultant velocity =?
a: is the velocity of the plane = 75.0 mi/h
b: is the velocity of the wind = 15.0 mi/h
θ: is the angle between "a" and "b"
The angle between "a" and "b" can be found as follows:
Now, by using the law of cosines we have:
Therefore, the resultant velocity is 86.1 mi/h.
The law of sines is:
Where:
γ: is the angle between "b" and "c"
α: is the angle between "a" and "c"
So, if we want to find "c" by using the law of sines, we need to know another angle besides θ (γ or α), and the statement does not give us.
I hope it helps you!
Answer:
d) False. If the angular momentum is zero, it implies in electro without turning, which would create a collapse towards the nucleus, so in both models the moment must be different from zero
Explanation:
Affirmations
a) true. The orbits are accurate in the Bohr model and probabilistic in quantum mechanics
b) True. If both give the same results and use the same quantum number (n)
c) True. If in angular momentum it is quantized, in the Bohr model too but it does not justify it
d) False. If the angular momentum is zero, it implies in electro without turning, which would create a collapse towards the nucleus, so in both models the moment must be different from zero
