Answer:
p-fluoronitrobenzene and sodium phenoxide is more appropriate
Explanation:
An ipso substitution is required to form p-nitrophenyl phenyl ether.
For this ipso substitution, an alkoxide anion needs to attack as a nucleophile at the carbon atom attached to fluorine atom and thereby substitute that F atom.
p-nitrophenoxide is an weak nucleophile as compared to phenoxide due to presence of electron withdrawing resonating effect of nitro group at para position.
p-fluoronitrobenzene is a good choice for nucleophilic attack by alkoxide anion as compared to fluorobenzene due to higher positive charge density at carbon atom directly attached to F atom. Higher positive charge density arises due to presence of electron withdrawing resonating effect og nitro group at para position.
So, p-fluoronitrobenzene and sodium phenoxide is more appropriate
Answer:
For large rivers the problem is not simply a matter of deduction of consumptive use from runoff: it is more complex and the complexity is related to the changes in .
Explanation:
<h3>Answer:</h3>
162.43 g of FeCl₂
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
Step 1: Calculate mass of Fe;
As,
Density = Mass ÷ Volume
Or,
Mass = Density × Volume
Where Volume is the volume of water displaced = 10.4 mL
Putting values,
Mass = 7.86 g.mL⁻¹ × 10.4 mL
Mass = 81.744 g of Fe
Step 2: Calculate amount of FeCl₂;
The balance chemical equation is as follow,
Fe + 2 HCl → FeCl₂ + H₂ ↑
According to this equation,
55.85 g (1 mol) Fe produced = 110.98 g (1 mol) of FeCl₂
So,
81.744 g Fe will produce = X g of FeCl₂
Solving for X,
X = (81.744 g × 110.98 g) ÷ 55.85 g
X = 162.43 g of FeCl₂
We have gravity here on earth while in space there’s none