Answer:
D. It is limited to situations that involve aqueous solutions or specific compounds.
Explanation:
An Arrhenius acid is a substance that increases the concentration of H3O or H+ when dissolved in water. An Arrhenius base is a substance that increases the concentration of OH- when dissolved in water. These definitions tell us that D is indeed limited to situations that involve aqueous solutions or specific compounds, as aqueous means something that's dissolved in water.
A is wrong because the Bronsted-Lowry interpretation has a wider range of applications. Bronsted-Lowry acids and bases don't even need to be aqueous, so it is not limited to just aqueous solutions. They include any substance that can donate or accept a H+.
B is wrong because A is wrong. A and B basically say the same thing, that the Arrhenius interpretation has a wider range of applications than the Bronsted-Lowry interpretation.
C is wrong because the definition of an Arrhenius base is any substance that increases the concentration of OH-, or hydroxide ions. C completely counters this statement.
Here's photo for proof incase you're doubtful of my answer & explanation. Please click the heart if it helped.
True.
without natural selection darwin’s theory would not make sense :))
Answer:
50 percent
Explanation:
G g
g Gg gg
g Gg gg
since one of the plants are already heterozygous, only half will be heterozygous since the other plant is homzygous
Answer:
.54 mol
Explanation:
Using the ΔH given for the balanced reaction, convert kilojoules to moles of CO2 using the stoichiometric ratio:
250 kJ×(6 moles CO22803 kJ)=0.5351 moles CO2
The answer should have two significant figures, so round to 0.54 moles CO2.
Notice that coefficients in stoichiometric equations (indicating numbers of moles) are exact, so they do not constrain the number of significant figures.