Answer: A) True, you are correct
==================================================
Explanation:
Power in physics is defined as
power = (change in work)/(change in time)
which shows that power is basically the rate of work done. We can think of it like a speed of sorts.
------------
For example, if you apply 100 joules of work over 2 seconds, then,
power = (100 joules)/(2 seconds)
power = (100/2) joules per second
power = 50 watts
A watt is defined to be a joule per second, and it's often used to measure how much electricity is consumed, but it has broader uses in physics as well.
The can occupy similar volumes but they vary greatly in DENSITY.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Covalent Bond is found between the atoms of a molecule.
Complete Question:
The momentum of an object is determined to be 7.2 × 10-3 kg⋅m/s. Express this quantity as provided or use any equivalent unit. (Note: 1 kg = 1000 g).
Answer:
7.2 gm/s.
Explanation:
Momentum can be defined as the multiplication (product) of the mass possessed by an object and its velocity. Momentum is considered to be a vector quantity because it has both magnitude and direction.
Mathematically, momentum is given by the formula;
Given the following data;
Momentum = 7.2 * 10^-3 kgm/s
1 kg = 1000 g
Substituting the unit in kilograms with grams, we have;
Momentum = 7.2 * 10^-3 * 1000 gm/s
<em>Momentum = 7.2 gm/s. </em>
Answer:
a. verify that your observations are correct
c. think about what else might cause the observed discrepancy
Explanation:
Let's begin by explaining that a law is an affirmation (something established) based on repeated long-term observation of a phenomenon that has been studied and verified.
That is: A law is present in all known theories and therefore is considered universal. In addition, <u>a law can not be refuted, nor changed, because its precepts have been proven through various studies.</u>
Then, based on what is explained above, Kepler's laws of planetary motion exist because they were rigorously tested and verified, therefore they can not be refuted.
So, if we have a small discrepancy between the predicted and actual positions of Uranus after using Kepler's laws, we have to verify carefully our observations again and search what might be causing that discrepancy. But we cannot assume Kepler's Laws are incorrecto or need modifications.
In addition, we cannot consider that Uranus may not be a planet, because the discrepancy is small. In fact, this discrepancy lead to the discovery of another planet, Neptune.