1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gelneren [198K]
3 years ago
5

Si tu velocidad al caminar es 0,3 m/s. Determina el tiempo que demorarias en llegar al sol en horas (REALIZAR TRANSFORMACIÓN DE

SEGUNDOS A HORAS) suponiendo que puedes ir caminando al sol. La distancia de la tierra al sol es 149597870700 m
Physics
1 answer:
Contact [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

138,516,546.9 horas.

Explanation:

Tenemos que usar la ecuación:

Velocidad = distancia/tiempo

Acá tenemos:

Velocidad = 0.3m/s

distancia = 149597870700 m

y queremos resolver la ecuación para el tiempo:

0.3m/s =  149597870700m/tiempo.

tiempo =  149597870700m/(0.3m/s) = 498,659,569,000 s

y sabemos que una hora tiene 3600 segundos, entonces si queremos transformar de segundos a horas tenemos:

498,659,569,000 s = (498,659,569,000/3600) h = 138,516,546.9 horas.

You might be interested in
Starting from rest, a truck travels in a straight line for 8.0 s with a uniform acceleration of +1.6 m/s2. The driver then appli
lana [24]
Because it should be the total number
4 0
4 years ago
Tarzan swings on a 31.0 m long vine initially inclined at an angle of 36.0◦ with the vertical. The acceleration of gravity if 9.
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

v=10.777m/s

Explanation:

Tarzan swing can be thought of as change in potential energy by going from higher location We solve for height of beginning of the swing by using simple cosine equation:

So

31Cos36=25.08\\E_{potential}=mgh\\

ΔE=mg(h₂-h₁)

=m*9.81(31-25.08)\\

The potential energy of Tarzan initial position is converted into kinetic energy of his swing.By using kinetic equation

E_{kinectic}=P_{potential}\\1/2mv^{2}=m*9.81(31.0-25.08)\\(1/2)v^{2}=9.81(31.0-25.08)\\0.5v^{2}=58.07\\v^{2}=58.07/0.5\\v=\sqrt{58.07/0.5}\\ v=10.777m/s    

8 0
3 years ago
If a quasar is moving away from us at v/c = 0.8, what is the measured redshift?
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

The measured redshift is z =2

Explanation:

Since the object is traveling near light speed, since v/c = 0.8, then we have to use a redshift formula for relativistic speeds.

z= \sqrt{\cfrac{c+v}{c-v}}-1

Finding the redshift.

We can prepare the formula by dividing by lightspeed inside the square root to both numerator and denominator to get

z= \sqrt{\cfrac{1+\cfrac vc}{1-\cfrac vc}}-1

Replacing the given information

z= \sqrt{\cfrac{1+0.8}{1-0.8}}-1

z= \sqrt{\cfrac{1.8}{0.2}}-1\\z= \sqrt{9}}-1\\z=3-1\\z=2

Thus the measured redshift is z = 2.

4 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
Por favor ayuda que ejercicio debo hacer para enflacar en una semana xd
Serggg [28]

Answer:

Un excelente ejercicio para perder barriga rápidamente es correr, ya que el cuerpo gasta una mayor cantidad de calorías en un corto período de tiempo, en tan sólo 30 minutos corriendo se queman unas 300 calorías.

...

Qué ejercicios realizar

Correr. ...

Clase aeróbica. ...

Saltar cuerda. ...

Bicicleta. ...

Caminar rápido. ...

Natación.

Explanation:

dame coronita por favor

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The attractive electrostatic force between the point charges 6.14×10−6 c and q has a magnitude of 0.845 n when the separation be
    11·1 answer
  • A vertical steel beam in a building supports a load of 6.0×10⁴. If the length of the beam is 4.0m and it's cross-sectional area
    11·1 answer
  • If I push on a wall with a force of 3500 N for 5 hours but the wall does not move, how much work have I done.
    9·1 answer
  • Explain why the moon appears to go through a cycle of phases.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the rate at which energy is transformed from one form to another called?
    12·1 answer
  • When you are paddling a canoe, you push the water backwards with your paddle, witch in turn will push you forward. Witch law of
    5·1 answer
  • Consider an electron that is 100 m from an alpha particle ( = 3.2 x 10-19 C). (Enter the magnitudes.) (a) What is the electric f
    6·1 answer
  • According to the videos seen in Modules 8, please write a short paragraph answering the following questions: a. What are some ex
    5·1 answer
  • (Please Help! Match the sentence to the number down below! Please I'll give brainlist and points!)
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following would cause the force of kinetic friction to increase?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!