The answer is C) <span>The sample was broken down by the electric current and formed a new substance that could burn. Therefore, the original liquid is a compound. </span>
Answer:
Energy is neither created nor destroyed.
Explanation:
The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed. The total energy of an isolated system remains conserved. It never gets 0. It changes from one form of energy to other but never vanishes.
Hence, the correct option is (d) "Energy is neither created nor destroyed"
Answer:
C6H12O6 → 2C2H5OH + 2CO2
Explanation:
Glucose is an organic molecule, specifically a sugar, with the formula C612O6 while ethanol is another organic molecule with formula; C2H5OH.
However, as rightly said in this question, ethanol can be got from glucose via a process called fermentation in the presence of a catalyst called YEAST. The balanced equation is as follows:
C6H12O6 → 2C2H5OH + 2CO2
The volume of a substance is simply the ratio of mass and
density. Therefore:
volume = mass / density
Calculating for volume of Carbon Tetrachloride that the
student has to pour out:
volume = 55.0 g / (1.59 g / cm^3)
<span>volume = 34.60 cm^3</span>
Answer:
Some parameters in the population genetics of mutations*.
Naturally, a review of this length cannot cover all aspects of the population genetics of mutations. For example, mutation plays a pivotal part in coalescent theory (Hein et al. 2005) and in the construction of genotype–phenotype maps that are at the core of some efforts to understand adaptive landscapes, which provide a paradigm for understanding many broader aspects of population genetics from the perspective of individual mutations (‘causes cancer or not’), as reviewed elsewhere (Loewe 2009). Here we focus almost entirely on how populations of individuals are changed by large numbers of mutations that have specified effects on fitness.
In §2 of this paper, we discuss what is known about the diversity of mutations, and here and subsequently we refer to other papers in this themed issue that provide more in-depth information. In §3, we review some of the relevant theory in population genetics, starting with (i) simple theories that treat the fate of individual mutations in isolation before turning to more complicated models that consider (ii) linkage, (iii) epistasis, (iv) quantitative genetics approaches, and (v) challenges faced when attempting to integrate all these. Subsequently, we provide an overview of several general questions that have been resolved and others that remain (§4) and finally some conclusions (§5).2