1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
5

n the sequence $121, 1221, 12221, \dots ,$ the $n$th number consists of $n$ copies of the digit $2$, surrounded by two $1$s. How

many of the first $100$ terms in the sequence are divisible by $3$?
Mathematics
2 answers:
asambeis [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

  33

Step-by-step explanation:

The number is divisible by 3 if the sum of digits is divisible by 3. 1221 is the first number with a sum of digits divisible by 3. Adding 3 more 2s to the sequence will result in another number divisible by 3.

So, every 3rd term from n=2 to n=98 will be divisible by 3, for a total of 33 terms out of the first 100 in the sequence.

balandron [24]3 years ago
7 0

The nth number in the sequence can be expressed as

a_n=10^{n+1}+\displaystyle2\sum_{i=2}^n10^i+21

Extracting the nth term from the sum gives

a_n=10^{n+1}+2\cdot10^n+\displaystyle2\sum_{i=2}^{n-1}10^i+21

and 10^{n+1}+2\cdot10^n=10^n(10+2)=12\cdot10^n. 3 divides both 12 and 21, so 12\cdot10^n and 21 contribute no remainder.

This leaves us with

a_n\equiv10\cdot\underbrace{222\ldots222}_{n-2\text{ copies}}\pmod3

Recall that a decimal integer is divisible by 3 if its digits add to a multiple of 3. The digits in 10\cdot222\ldots222 are n-2 copies of 2 and one 0, so the digital sum is 2(n-2)=2n-4.

  • If n=3k for k=0,1,2,3,\ldots, then the digital sum is 2(3k)-4=6k-4, which is not divisible by 3.
  • If n=3k+1, then the sum is 2(3k+1)-4=6k-2, which is not divisible by 3.
  • If n=3k+2, then the sum is 2(3k+2)-4=6k, which is always divisble by 3.

This means that roughly 1/3 of the first n numbers in this sequence are divisible by 3; among the first 100 terms, they occur for n=2,5,8,\ldots,95,98, of which there are 33.

You might be interested in
How could you correctly rewrite the equation 4(10+5) = 6(12 - 2) using the distributive property?
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

40+20=72-12

60=60

Step-by-step explanation:

4*10+4*5=6*12-6*2

40+20=72-12

60+60

7 0
2 years ago
Triangle abc is shown below
scZoUnD [109]

no it its not there,,......

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.
horrorfan [7]
A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}
where:
N(t) is the population after t years
N_{0} is the initial population 
t is the time in years 
r is the growth rate in decimal form 
e is the Euler's constant 
We now for our investigation that N(t)=238300, N_{0} =192157, and t=10; lets replace those values in our equation to find r:
238300=192157e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}
r=0.022
Now lets multiply r by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
(0.022)(100)=2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that N(t)=713777, N_{0} =951307, and t=10. Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find r:
713777=951307e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}
r=-0.029
(-0.029)(100)= -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}.
Final equation from point B: N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations N(t)=192157e^{0.022t} and N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t} and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})
t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=31.36
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be 2(951307)=1902614. Now we can rewrite our equation as: N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}. The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )
t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=44.95
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit. 

  
8 0
3 years ago
Could anyone find this?
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the squares have areas of 32u^2. The side lengths are

s=\sqrt{32}\\ \\ \text{By the Pythagorean Theorem}\\ \\ x^2=s^2+s^2\\ \\ x^2=32+32\\ \\ x^2=64\\ \\ x=\sqrt{64}\\ \\ x=8

8 0
2 years ago
100 point will mark brainliest to first answer only
dimaraw [331]

Answer: no yes

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Three hamburgers and one milkshake cost $6.80. Two hamburgers and one milkshake cost $5.30
    15·1 answer
  • Y-1=4y-2/3<br> y=_____<br> solve
    10·2 answers
  • Find the additive and multiplicative inverse for -7
    6·2 answers
  • How to remember length times weigth
    6·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=b%20%3D%20%20log_%7B10%7D%28a%29%20" id="TexFormula1" title="b = log_{10}(a) " alt="b = log_
    14·1 answer
  • You lose four points each time you attend gym class without your gym shoes. You forgot your shoes three times this month. What i
    11·1 answer
  • Based on the data given in the table,
    5·1 answer
  • ace biked rentals bikes for 28$ per day , renters can keep the bike for 8 hours , barts bikes rent bikes for 30$ per day , rente
    14·1 answer
  • A carpenter has wood that is 5x+2 feet long. How long is the wood after 2x-5 feet have been cut off. (type in your solution so i
    8·2 answers
  • Megan, Sam, and Alex are running for class president. 1/4 of the class voted for Megan. 3/10 of the class voted for Sam. Which o
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!