1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
9

The experimental evidence that electrons could act as waves was based on quantized wavelengths and diffraction pattern evidence.

True or False???
Chemistry
2 answers:
koban [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: -

When electrons are fired at an element, the resulting interference pattern is called electron diffraction.

Electrons get scattered on hitting and they are observed via a luminescent screen. The pattern of scattered electrons is consistent with wave behavior like that of X rays.

The experimental evidence that electrons could act as waves was based on quantized wavelengths and diffraction pattern evidence is therefore correct.

o-na [289]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

There was a theory proposed by the French physicist <u>Louis de Broglie</u> in 1923. This theory basically states that particles that are studied in quantum mechanics (for example, electrons and light), exhibit properties that can be seen when studying both particles, and waves. This theory was called Wave-Particle Duality.

When studying electrons, they were observed to behave like particles in certain experiments, however, in other experiments they also behaved how a wave would. We think of electrons as particles, which have mass, but they can also be diffracted like electromagnetic waves.

You might be interested in
50 extra if correct !!
leva [86]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

the gradual movement of the continents across the earth's surface through geological time.

7 0
3 years ago
What expression approximates the volume of O2 consumed, measure at STP, when 55 g of Al reacts completely with excess O2?2 Al(s)
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

34.28 L ( 1.5*22.4 L)

Explanation:

Calculation of the moles of aluminum as:-

Mass = 55 g

Molar mass of aluminum = 26.981539 g/mol

The formula for the calculation of moles is shown below:

moles = \frac{Mass\ taken}{Molar\ mass}

Thus,

Moles= \frac{55\ g}{26.981539\ g/mol}

Moles= 2.0384\ mol

According to the reaction:-

4Al+3O_2\rightarrow 2Al_2O_3

4 moles of aluminum react with 3 moles of oxygen gas

1 mole of aluminum react with \frac{3}{4} moles of oxygen gas

2.0384 moles of aluminum react with \frac{3}{4}\times 2.0384 moles of oxygen gas

Moles of oxygen gas = 1.5288 moles

At STP,  

Pressure = 1 atm  

Temperature = 273.15 K

Using ideal gas equation as:

PV=nRT

where,

P is the pressure

V is the volume

n is the number of moles

T is the temperature

R is Gas constant having value = 0.0821 L.atm/K.mol

Applying the equation as:

1 atm × V = 1.5288 mol × 0.0821 L.atm/K.mol × 273.15 K

⇒V = 34.28 L ( 1.5*22.4 L)

7 0
3 years ago
A gas mixture with a total pressure of 765 mmHg contains each of the following gases at the indicated partial pressures: 134 mmH
ladessa [460]

Answer: c

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
CH4 + 202 → CO2 + 2H2O
ohaa [14]
It’s a combustion reaction but what are you trying to find?
6 0
2 years ago
Louisa put a bowl of water and a bowl of sand in the sun. She put a thermometer in each bowl. Then she recorded the temperature
Helen [10]

The experiment that was carried out by Louisa goes to show us that different materials heat up at different rates.

<h3>What is the specific heat capacity?</h3>

The term specific heat capacity just goes to show us the amount of heat that must be absorbed before the temperature of an object would rise by 1 K. In this case, we can see that we have been told that the after 30 minutes, the sand had heated more than the water. This simply implies that the energy that the sand and the water absorbed was able to increase the temperature of the sand mush more than it increased the temperature of the water.

Thus we can see that the heat capacity of the sand is much less than the heat capacity of the water since the sand could be able to be heated up much faster than the the water could be heated up.

Learn more about heat capacity:brainly.com/question/28302909

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • If it takes 22974 J to heat 96.5 g of a substance from 13.46°C to 73.86 °C, what is the specific heat of the substance?​
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following substances are largely ionic?
    8·1 answer
  • Calculate the concentration in molality of calcium phosphate in a solution containing 250.0 grams of pure water when the freezin
    5·1 answer
  • An igneous rock that contains mostly plagioclase feldspar and about 30 percent dark silicate minerals has a composition that is
    15·1 answer
  • Wat is a redox reaction
    8·1 answer
  • An electrolytic cell is based upon a nonspontaneous reaction; the Eocell for the reaction is _____.
    13·1 answer
  • if two atoms share electrons how does knowledge of the electronegativity of each atom help determine if the bond will be polar
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following experimental observations proved that the plum pudding model was flawed? (1 point)
    10·1 answer
  • Which is not one of the parts of the cell theory.
    12·1 answer
  • In scientific notation, the number 0.00262 is expressed as
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!