1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
3 years ago
14

Which statement describes a property of a magnet? A. It attracts ferrous materials. B. It could have only one pole (north or sou

th). C. It points in a random direction when suspended. D. It repels non-ferrous materials.
Physics
1 answer:
hodyreva [135]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It attracts ferrous materials

Explanation:

A magnet attracts ferrous materials A ferrous materials are metallic substances or conductors that can conduct heat and electricity. Example of this ferrous materials includes iron, metal etc. Since magnets only can attracts metallic substance to itself, then we can also conclude that they attract ferrous materials since ferrous materials. possesses properties of a metal.

Magnets possesses both north and south poles.

The same of the bar magnets are known to repel each other while unlike poles attract each other.

You might be interested in
What relationship exists betwen air resistance and acceleration of falling objects
ololo11 [35]
They both make a thing go faster and slower but the relationship is force.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do elements within a group have similar chemical properties
CaHeK987 [17]
Elements<span> in the same </span>group<span> in the periodic table </span>have similar chemical properties<span>. This is because their atoms </span>have<span> the same number of electrons in the highest occupied energy level. </span>Group<span> 1 </span>elements<span> are reactive metals called the alkali metals.</span>Group<span> 0 </span>elements<span> are unreactive non-metals called the noble gases.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me please
TEA [102]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Because it is impossible for it to show the real depth of the ocean and how deep it is

8 0
3 years ago
Who showed that our universe is heliocentric—the planets of the solar system revolve around the sun? Johannes Kepler Isaac Newto
denis23 [38]

Answer:

Option (3)

Explanation:

Nicolaus Copernicus was an astronomer from Poland, who was born on the 19th of February in the year 1473. He played a great role in the field of modern astronomy.

He was the person who contributed to the heliocentric theory. This theory describes the position of the sun in the middle of the universe, and all the planets move around the sun. This theory was initially not accepted, and after about a century it was widely accepted.

This theory describes the present-day motion of the planets around the sun in the solar system. This theory replaced the geocentric theory.

Thus, the correct answer is option (3).

6 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know these four?! I really need help and fast pls
Mama L [17]

Evidence: Data gathered

Experiment: Looking through a telescope

Observations: Testing what happens

Reasoning: Thinking a problem through

I believe that these should be correct.

Hoping you pass!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The sun appears to move through the background stars. This apparent motion would not exist if:_________.
    12·1 answer
  • A wire is used as a heating element that has a resistance that is fairly independent of its temperature within its operating ran
    9·1 answer
  • One day in second grade, Chris drank chocolate milk before recess. She then played hard during recess and got sick from the heat
    9·2 answers
  • RACTIC PTUDIES
    8·1 answer
  • A small ball with mass 1.20 kg is mounted on one end of a rod 0.860 m long and of negligible mass. The system rotates in a horiz
    9·1 answer
  • QUESTION 1
    15·1 answer
  • A tree frog leaping upward off the tree branch is pulled downward by
    11·1 answer
  • Stars emit different wavelengths of visible light due to their different
    14·2 answers
  • How would a graph of velocity vs. Time would look like, if there was no motion at all? (Draw your graph)
    9·1 answer
  • PLEWSE SOMEONE HELP ILL MARK BRAINLIST
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!