Most likely, the light wave will be absorbed by the wall. Without any information as to the size and color of the wall, the location and size of the hole, or the location of the light wave, this is a generalized probability problem. For all of the places the light could be, it's more likely that it hits the wall than the hole (if the hole is less than 50% of the area of the wall).
Answer:
Negative
Explanation:
If the box is heading right in the positive direction, the work will be negative. The spring has an opposite force to that of the box.
Hope this helped. :)
Answer:
d. We can calculate it by applying Newton's version of Kepler's third law
Explanation:
The measurements of a Star like the Sun have several problems, the first one is distance, but the most important is the temperature since as we get closer all the instruments will melt. This is why all measurements must be indirect because of the effects that these variables create on nearby bodies.
Kepler's laws are deduced from Newton's law of universal gravitation, in these laws the mass of the Sun affects the orbit of the planets since it creates a force of attraction, if measured the orbit and the time it takes to travel it we can know the centripetal acceleration and with it knows the force, from where we clear the mass of the son.
Let's review the statements of the exercise
.a) False. We don't have good enough models for this calculation
.b) False. The size of the sun is very difficult to measure because it is a mass of gas, in addition the density changes strongly with depth
.c) False. The amount of light that comes out of the sun is not all the light produced and is due to quantum effects where the mass of the sun is not taken into account
.d) True. This method has been used to calculate the mass of the sun and the other planets since the variable distance and time are easily measured from Earth
Correct answer is D
Answer:
move the wire loops closer
Explanation:
because the closer t they are the more concentrated the energy is in that specific area
