Answer:
The Inverse variation states a relationship between the two variable in which the product is constant.
i.e 
then the equation is of the form: 
where k is the constant of variation.
As per the given information: It is given that x and y vary inversely and that y = 1/6 when x = 3.
then, by definition of inverse variation;
xy = k ......[1]
Substitute the given values we have;
Now, find the value of y when x = 10.
Substitute the given values of x=10 and k = 1/2, in [1] we have;
Divide both sides by 10 we get;
therefore, a function that models the inverse variation is; 
and value of when x = 10.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
34160
Step-by-step explanation:
1220x(7x4)=<em>p</em>
1. 7x4=28
2. 1220x28=<em>p</em>
3. 1220x8=9760
4. 1220x2+ a zero at the end=24400
5. 9760+24400=34160.
pls mark as brainliest.
1/4 is equal to 4/16 so the answer would be B. 4
To solve this you can multiply the denominator and numerator by the same number to get an equivalent fraction. In this case you would divide the denominator of the equivalent fraction we are finding the numerator for (16) by the denominator of the original faction.
?/16 / 4 16/4 = 4
The numerator is 4 making the equivalent fraction 4/16.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The proof assumes that n=m=2k, which is false in general.
Step-by-step explanation:
If n is an even number, then n=2k for some integer k. In the same way, if m is an even number, then m=2j for some integer j. It is important to write two different letters, k and j, because these integers are not necessarily equal.
For example, take n=10 and m=30. Then k=5 and j=15, so they are different. The fallacy of this proof is that it assumes k=j.
A correct proof would continue like this: by the usual laws of algebra we have that n+m=2k+2j=2(k+j). Since k+j is an integer, n+m=2p for some integer p=k+j, hence n+m is even.
