Answer:
um, when you talk with other people about stuff. (I'm not trying to sound like a smarta s s I'm just giving a definition...)
Explanation:
Wouldn't it be neat if an electron falling closer to the nucleus ... emitting a
photon ... actually gave out more energy than it needed to climb to its original
energy level by absorbing a photon ! If there were some miraculous substance
that could do that, we'd have it made.
All we'd need is a pile of it in our basement, with a bright light bulb over the pile,
connected to a tiny hand-crank generator.
Whenever we wanted some energy, like for cooking or heating the house, we'd
switch the light bulb on, point it towards the pile, and give the little generator a
little shove. It wouldn't take much to git 'er going.
The atoms in the pile would absorb some photons, raising their electrons to higher
energy levels. Then the electrons would fall back down to lower energy levels,
releasing more energy than they needed to climb up. We could take that energy,
use some of it to keep the light bulb shining on the pile, and use the extra to heat
the house or run the dishwasher.
The energy an electron absorbs when it climbs to a higher energy level (forming
the atom's absorption spectrum) is precisely identical to the energy it emits when
it falls back to its original level (creating the atom's emission spectrum).
Energy that wasn't either there in the atom to begin with or else pumped
into it from somewhere can't be created there.
You get what you pay for, or, as my grandfather used to say, "For nothing
you get nothing."
Answer:
A) 
= 1.44 kg m², B) moment of inertia must increase
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is defined by
I = ∫ r² dm
For figures with symmetry it is tabulated, in the case of a cylinder the moment of inertia with respect to a vertical axis is
I = ½ m R²
A very useful theorem is the parallel axis theorem that states that the moment of inertia with respect to another axis parallel to the center of mass is
I = 
+ m D²
Let's apply these equations to our case
The moment of inertia is a scalar quantity, so we can add the moment of inertia of the body and both arms
=
+ 2 
= ½ M R²
The total mass is 64 kg, 1/8 corresponds to the arms and the rest to the body
M = 7/8 m total
M = 7/8 64
M = 56 kg
The mass of the arms is
m’= 1/8 m total
m’= 1/8 64
m’= 8 kg
As it has two arms the mass of each arm is half
m = ½ m ’
m = 4 kg
The arms are very thin, we will approximate them as a particle
= M D²
Let's write the equation
= ½ M R² + 2 (m D²)
Let's calculate
= ½ 56 0.20² + 2 4 0.20²
= 1.12 + 0.32
= 1.44 kg m²
b) if you separate the arms from the body, the distance D increases quadratically, so the moment of inertia must increase
1,000 W = 1 kW
100 W = 0.1 kW
(0.1 kW) x (6 h) = 0.6 kWh <=== energy
(0.6 kWh) x (£0.1359/kWh) = £0.0815 <=== cost of it
Answer:
The value of change in internal energy of the gas = + 1850 J
Explanation:
Work done on the gas (W) = - 1850 J
Negative sign is due to work done on the system.
From the first law we know that Q = Δ U + W ------------- (1)
Where Q = Heat transfer to the gas
Δ U = Change in internal energy of the gas
W = work done on the gas
Since it is adiabatic compression of the gas so heat transfer to the gas is zero.
⇒ Q = 0
So from equation (1)
⇒ Δ U = - W ----------------- (2)
⇒ W = - 1850 J (Given)
⇒ Δ U = - (- 1850)
⇒ Δ U = + 1850 J
This is the value of change in internal energy of the gas.
