All categories

3 years ago

The centripetal force acting on the space shuttle

Physics

2 answers:

tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

(4) weight

Explanation:

The centripetal force acting on the space shuttle in orbit is given by:

$F=m\frac{v^2}{r}$

where

m is the mass of the shuttle

v is the tangential speed of the shuttle

r is the radius of its circular orbit

When the shuttle orbits the Earth, the centripetal force that keeps the shuttle in circular motion is given by the gravitational attraction between the shuttle and the Earth, which corresponds to the weight of the shuttle, and it is given by:

$F=G\frac{Mm}{r^2}$

where

G is the gravitational constant

M is the Earth's mass

And this force, therefore, corresponds to the centripetal force.

mario62 [17]3 years ago

7 0

Option (4) is correct. The centripetal force acting on the space shuttle is equal to the weight of the space shuttle.

Explanation:

The centripetal force is the force that is experienced by a body when it is moving in a circular path. As the body moves, the force experienced by the body towards its center and it is called as the centripetal force.

When the space shuttle present in the space is moving around the Earth in a particular orbit, there is a force acting on the space shuttle due to its speed in the circular path. This force is the centripetal force.

To keep the space shuttle to move in its definite path, the weight of the space shuttle acts in the direction opposite to the centripetal force and keeps the shuttle from moving out of the path.

Thus, Option (4) is correct. The centripetal force acting on the space shuttle is equal to the weight of the space shuttle.

Learn More:

1. What is the acceleration of the block under friction brainly.com/question/7031524

2. The net force acting on the refrigerator brainly.com/question/4033012

3. The result of the unbalanced force acting on a body is brainly.com/question/2720955

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Physics

Chapter: Circular motion

Keywords:

Centripetal, force, space, shuttle, earth, inertia, weight, momentum, weight, circular, definite path.

You might be interested in

The electric potential at a point in space is -890 V. If a 0.0285 C charge is placed there, what will its potential energy U be?

BabaBlast [244]

Answer: -25.4

Explanation:

Acellus don’t forget the negative sign

5 0

3 years ago

How are energy, force, and the motion of objects related?

OLEGan [10]

Answer:

When two objects interact, each one exerts a force on the other that can cause energy to be transferred to or from the object. For example, when energy is transferred to an Earth-object system as an object is raised, the gravitational field energy of the system increases. This energy is released as the object falls; the mechanism of this release is the gravitational force. Likewise, two magnetic and electrically charged objects interacting at a distance exert forces on each other that can transfer energy between the interacting objects.

Explanation:

Even when an object is sitting still, it has energy stored inside that can be turned into kinetic energy (motion). ... A force is a push or pull that causes an object to move, change direction, change speed, or stop. Without a force, an object that is moving will continue to move and an object at rest will remain at rest.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The relationship between energy (E), power (P), and time (t) is

NemiM [27]

Answer:

The avarage power of the body is 96.898 watts.

Explanation:

We must notice that given definition of power implies a constant consumption of energy, so that we should assume that energy consumption is constant. A Calorie is equal to 4186 joules. If we know that $E = 2000\,Cal$ and $t = 1\,day$ , the power of body, measured in watts, is:

$P = \frac{(2000\,Cal)\cdot \left(4186\,\frac{J}{Cal} \right)}{(1\,day)\cdot \left(24\,\frac{h}{day} \right)\cdot \left(3600\,\frac{s}{h} \right)}$

$P = 96.898\,W$

The avarage power of the body is 96.898 watts.

3 0

4 years ago

The solar noon solar radiation values at the top of the atmosphere above maun are 1366 wm−2 on february 2 and 1074 wm−2 on augus

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

You haven't stated any numbers showing that the intensity of solar radiation at the surface is lower than at the top of the atmosphere. Your data only show that the value at the top of the atmosphere is different on different dates.

From our vast experience, however, we do know that the solar intensity at the surface IS lower than it is at the top of the atmosphere, simply because the atmosphere absorbs some solar radiation ... different amounts of it at different wavelengths.

That's the main reason, for example, why the sky is red at sunrise and sunset and blue the rest of the day, and why the temperature of the air is so much higher than 3° absolute, and why we aren't broiled by X-rays all day. Also the reason why it's worth the tremendous cost and makes such a difference to build astronomical observatories on mountain tops and in low-Earth-orbit, instead of in convenient deep valleys.

8 0

3 years ago

Im building a car in a vidio game and i need a scetch of trophy truck suspention if you dont know dont answer

Leviafan [203]

Answer:

if i could, i would draw one....What is your email??

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago