Answer:
0.5m^2/Vs and 0.14m^2/Vs
Explanation:
To calculate the mobility of electron and mobility of hole for gallium antimonide we have,
(S)
Where
e= charge of electron
n= number of electrons
p= number of holes
mobility of electron
mobility of holes
electrical conductivity
Making the substitution in (S)
Mobility of electron
Mobility of hole in (S)
Then, solving the equation:
(1)
(2)
We have,
Mobility of electron 
Mobility of hole is 
Explanation:
A.
H = Aeσ^4
Using the stefan Boltzmann law
When we differentiate
dH/dT = 4AeσT³
dH/dT = 4(0.15)(0.9)(5.67)(10^-8)(650)³
= 8.4085
Exact error = 8.4085x20
= 168.17
H(650) = 0.15(0.9)(5.67)(10^-8)(650)⁴
= 1366.376watts
B.
Verifying values
H(T+ΔT) = 0.15(0.9)(5.67)(10)^-8(670)⁴
= 1542.468
H(T+ΔT) = 0.15(0.9)(5.67)(10^-8)(630)⁴
= 1205.8104
Error = 1542.468-1205.8104/2
= 168.329
ΔT = 40
H(T+ΔT) = 0.15(0.9)(5.67)(10)^-8(690)⁴
= 1735.05
H(T-ΔT) = 0.15(0.9)(5.67)(10^-8)(610)⁴
= 1735.05-1059.83/2
= 675.22/2
= 337.61
Answer:
a) the object floats
b) the object floats
c) the object sinks
Explanation:
when an object is less dense than in the fluid in which it is immersed, it will float due to its weight and volume characteristics, so to solve this problem we must find the mass and volume of each object in order to calculate the density and compare it with that of water
a)
volumen for a cube
V=L^3
L=1.53in=0.0388m
V=0.0388 ^3=5.8691x10^-5m^3=58.69ml
density=m/v
density=13.5g/58.69ml=0.23 g/ml
The wooden block floats because it is less dense than water
b)
m=111mg=0.111g
density=m/v
density=0.111g/0.296ml=0.375g/ml
the metal paperclip floats because it is less dense than water
c)
V=0.93cups=220.0271ml
m=0.88lb=399.1613g
Density=m/v
density=399.1613/220.027ml=1.8141g/ml
the apple sinks because it is denser than water
Answer: b) False
Explanation: Microscopic energy is the the energy that is based on the molecular level in a particular energy system. Microscopic energy basically comprise with tiny particles like atoms and molecules .The sum of all microscopic form of energy e together make the internal energy .Therefore, the statement given is false because the sum of all the microscopic forms of energy of a system is quantified as internal energy not flow energy.
